Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 18, 2014·Prudential Center, Newark

San Jose Sharks 4, New Jersey Devils 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 79% of the time.

NJD winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS1911429432
NJD08015214237

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:53SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Logan Couture, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P2 17:52SJSLogan CouturePPAssists: Patrick Marleau, Joe Pavelski · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–0
  3. P3 1:36SJSPatrick MarleauGWGAssists: Logan Couture, Justin Braun · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–0
  4. P3 8:00NJDMichael CammalleriAssists: Jaromir Jagr, Andy Greene · Slap, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P3 12:10NJDAdam HenriqueAssists: Michael Ryder, Jon Merrill · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:46SJSJoe ThorntonENAssists: Joe Pavelski · Wrist, 0.64 xG4–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:07NJDJordin Tootoo: Interference2 min
  2. P1 5:07NJDJordin Tootoo: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 5:07SJSAndrew Desjardins: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 10:57SJSJustin Braun: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 16:54NJDJon Merrill: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 0:33SJSJoe Thornton: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 3:29NJDJaromir Jagr: Interference2 min
  8. P2 9:49SJSScott Hannan: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 17:34NJDMichael Cammalleri: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NJD
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackNJD attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zajac won the faceoff against Pavelski
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSNJD
32Shots on goal37
4.6Expected goals2.6
48Shot attempts50
38Faceoffs won33
4Power plays3
11Penalty minutes13
6Hits10
8Blocked shots8
2Giveaways9
9Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestBurish – Desjardins – Hayes6:07

    xG 0.55–0.18 (76%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  2. Wingels – McGinn – Tierney7:20

    xG 0.58–0.25 (70%)attempts 10–3goals 0–2

  3. Marleau – Couture – Nieto10:37

    xG 0.44–0.33 (57%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

  4. Thornton – Pavelski – Hertl13:40

    xG 0.36–0.44 (45%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun16:19

    xG 0.91–0.55 (62%)attempts 12–11goals 0–0

  2. Hannan – Irwin13:33

    xG 0.60–0.64 (48%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

  3. Burns – Mueller14:47

    xG 0.38–0.52 (42%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestElias – Cammalleri – Brunner4:55

    xG 0.32–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  2. Jagr – Cammalleri – Zajac6:50

    xG 0.53–0.28 (66%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  3. Jagr – Zubrus – Zajac5:18

    xG 0.14–0.05 (73%)attempts 4–1goals 0–1

  4. Ruutu – Tootoo – Gionta4:33

    xG 0.18–0.28 (39%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestZidlicky – Merrill3:03

    xG 0.32–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

  2. Zidlicky – Gelinas5:35

    xG 0.32–0.03 (92%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Salvador – Zidlicky9:48

    xG 0.39–0.18 (68%)attempts 7–3goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NJD 2.6 xGSJS 4.6 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NJDSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 63/100 · #400 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.16 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50NJD 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 79% of the time.

NJD winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (NJD − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).