Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 27, 2014·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Montréal Canadiens 0, Edmonton Oilers 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL01007012029
EDM171517319

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:41EDMBenoit PouliotGWGAssists: Mark Arcobello · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:33EDMNail YakupovAssists: Benoit Pouliot, Mark Fayne · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P3 17:42EDMTaylor HallENAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Jesse Joensuu · Backhand, 0.67 xG0–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:20MTLAndrei Markov: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 3:21MTLBrandon Prust: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P1 5:56EDMJesse Joensuu: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 10:21EDMMark Fayne: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 10:31MTLDavid Desharnais: High sticking2 min
  6. P1 0:00MTLP.K. Subban: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 10:58EDMJordan Eberle: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 0:49MTLAlexei Emelin: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 9:25MTLDavid Desharnais: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 13:43EDMMartin Marincin: Illegal stick2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eller won the faceoff against Nugent-Hopkins
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLEDM
29Shots on goal19
3.3Expected goals3.1
61Shot attempts43
29Faceoffs won37
4Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
15Hits16
13Blocked shots21
9Giveaways19
7Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestDesharnais – Pacioretty – Gallagher11:44

    xG 1.77–0.15 (92%)attempts 19–7goals 0–0

  2. Prust – Bourque – Eller2:54

    xG 0.32–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  3. Plekanec – Parenteau – Galchenyuk7:34

    xG 0.39–0.31 (56%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1

  4. Malhotra – Moen – Prust5:42

    xG 0.15–0.08 (64%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMarkov – Gilbert10:53

    xG 1.52–0.21 (88%)attempts 14–13goals 0–1

  2. Subban – Beaulieu2:41

    xG 0.33–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  3. Weaver – Beaulieu5:33

    xG 0.46–0.20 (70%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. Purcell – Perron – Draisaitl4:57

    xG 0.09–0.14 (40%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Eberle – Hall – Nugent-Hopkins10:32

    xG 0.22–0.32 (41%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  3. Hendricks – Gordon – Joensuu8:10

    xG 0.06–0.57 (9%)attempts 1–10goals 0–0

  4. Pouliot – Arcobello – Yakupov6:56

    xG 0.25–1.53 (14%)attempts 8–13goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Schultz – Hunt11:02

    xG 0.14–0.36 (28%)attempts 6–12goals 0–0

  2. Fayne – Marincin13:13

    xG 0.16–0.65 (19%)attempts 6–16goals 1–0

  3. Ference – Petry13:14

    xG 0.79–1.73 (31%)attempts 16–16goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.1 xGMTL 3.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 10/100 · #1090 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.80 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 53% of the time.

EDM winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).