Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 28, 2014·Pepsi Center, Denver

San Jose Sharks 3, Colorado Avalanche 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 89% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
SJS12301818022351
COL0819112040233

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:23SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Mirco Mueller, Joe Thornton · Deflected, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P2 13:24COLAlex TanguaySHAssists: Erik Johnson, Jan Hejda · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P3 3:04COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Jan Hejda · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P3 5:03SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Justin Braun, Tommy Wingels · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. SJS Patrick Marleau scored
  2. 2. COL Alex Tanguay stopped
  3. 3. SJS Joe Pavelski scored
  4. 4. COL Matt Duchene stopped
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 4:24SJSMatt Nieto: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 17:18COLRyan O'Reilly: Interference2 min
  3. P2 2:15SJSBrent Burns: Interference2 min
  4. P2 12:26COLTyson Barrie: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 15:54COLGabriel Landeskog: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 5:36COLZach Redmond: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 14:29SJSBrent Burns: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 14:29SJSMirco Mueller: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 14:29COLJarome Iginla: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 14:29COLMax Talbot: Roughing2 min
  11. OT 3:55SJSPatrick Marleau: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Marleau won the faceoff against MacKinnon
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCOL
51Shots on goal33
5.6Expected goals2.5
84Shot attempts53
46Faceoffs won35
4Power plays3
10Penalty minutes12
11Hits26
7Blocked shots18
1Giveaways6
11Takeaways20

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Pavelski – Hertl11:12

    xG 2.33–0.31 (88%)attempts 21–11goals 1–1

  2. Sheppard – Nieto – Tierney9:49

    xG 0.61–0.03 (95%)attempts 12–2goals 0–0

  3. Marleau – Couture – Wingels10:16

    xG 0.63–0.45 (58%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

  4. Burish – Desjardins – McGinn6:47

    xG 0.18–0.13 (58%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBurns – Mueller14:16

    xG 1.81–0.10 (95%)attempts 19–4goals 1–1

  2. Vlasic – Braun16:31

    xG 1.68–0.44 (79%)attempts 25–19goals 1–0

  3. Hannan – Demers11:49

    xG 0.56–0.36 (61%)attempts 14–7goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Duchene – Landeskog5:27

    xG 0.30–0.02 (95%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  2. Tanguay – Talbot – Mitchell2:26

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Iginla – McGinn – MacKinnon3:02

    xG 0.21–0.17 (55%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Talbot – McGinn – MacKinnon3:42

    xG 0.05–0.14 (28%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Stuart – Barrie2:49

    xG 0.04–0.08 (36%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  2. Holden – Redmond2:13

    xG 0.02–0.17 (10%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Stuart – Holden9:57

    xG 0.09–0.73 (11%)attempts 3–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.5 xGSJS 5.6 xG
0123456P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 67/100 · #357 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.91 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 89% of the time.

COL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).