Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 6, 2014·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Florida Panthers 1, Philadelphia Flyers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 71% of the time.

PHI winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA06117012135
PHI21029011430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:53PHISean CouturierAssists: Brayden Schenn, Matt Read · Tip-in, 0.20 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:38PHIMichael Del ZottoGWGAssists: Brayden Schenn, Sean Couturier · Snap, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:50PHIPierre-Edouard BellemareAssists: Carlo Colaiacovo · Snap, 0.16 xG0–3
  4. P2 11:50FLANick BjugstadPPAssists: Jimmy Hayes, Dmitry Kulikov · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–3
  5. P2 12:29PHIJakub VoracekAssists: Claude Giroux, Mark Streit · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 7:58PHIVincent Lecavalier: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 14:28FLADerek MacKenzie: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 18:01PHIR.J. Umberger: Interference2 min
  4. P2 10:28PHIChris VandeVelde: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 19:05PHICarlo Colaiacovo: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 19:17FLANick Bjugstad: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 5:33FLATomas Kopecky: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 5:33PHISteve Mason: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 18:33PHIVincent Lecavalier: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 18:33FLAVincent Trocheck: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couturier won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAPHI
35Shots on goal30
2.0Expected goals3.1
65Shot attempts53
39Faceoffs won36
4Power plays2
8Penalty minutes12
35Hits35
14Blocked shots18
4Giveaways6
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – MacKenzie – Kopecky10:41

    xG 0.14–0.08 (63%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  2. Boyes – Fleischmann – Trocheck2:27

    xG 0.06–0.05 (55%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Fleischmann – Trocheck – Grimaldi7:25

    xG 0.17–0.28 (37%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  4. Boyes – Jokinen – Barkov6:36

    xG 0.12–0.39 (24%)attempts 7–7goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Campbell – Ekblad15:36

    xG 0.50–0.92 (35%)attempts 17–9goals 0–1

  2. Mitchell – Kulikov14:34

    xG 0.30–0.88 (25%)attempts 14–16goals 0–2

  3. Olsen – Gudbranson13:47

    xG 0.15–0.90 (15%)attempts 12–16goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestSchenn – Read – Couturier10:28

    xG 0.83–0.27 (75%)attempts 10–12goals 2–0

  2. Rinaldo – Akeson – Bellemare7:44

    xG 0.40–0.02 (94%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  3. Lecavalier – Umberger – VandeVelde6:30

    xG 0.57–0.24 (70%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

  4. Giroux – Voracek – Simmonds7:46

    xG 0.36–0.13 (74%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Del Zotto14:02

    xG 1.11–0.42 (72%)attempts 11–16goals 1–0

  2. Streit – Grossmann14:56

    xG 0.74–0.19 (79%)attempts 13–15goals 2–0

  3. Colaiacovo – Schenn13:43

    xG 0.22–0.34 (39%)attempts 10–13goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.1 xGFLA 2.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #906 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.68 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 71% of the time.

PHI winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).