Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 6, 2014·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Minnesota Wild 0, Ottawa Senators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

OTT winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN09010016035
OTT052418317

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:23OTTClarke MacArthurPPGWGAssists: Bobby Ryan, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:47OTTMike HoffmanAssists: Eric Gryba, Curtis Lazar · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P3 2:06OTTMike HoffmanAssists: Mark Stone, Patrick Wiercioch · Slap, 0.05 xG0–3
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 6:45MINChristian Folin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 9:11MINJustin Fontaine: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 15:01OTTCurtis Lazar: Embellishment2 min
  4. P1 15:01MINMathew Dumba: Interference2 min
  5. P2 0:57OTTMark Borowiecki: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 0:57MINMarco Scandella: Instigator2 min · PPG
  7. P2 0:57MINMarco Scandella: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 0:57MINMarco Scandella: Misconduct10 min
  9. P2 6:04OTTErik Karlsson: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 16:03MINThomas Vanek: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 17:05OTTPatrick Wiercioch: Interference2 min
  12. P2 17:05MINStephane Veilleux: Embellishment2 min
  13. P3 7:27MINMikael Granlund: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 13:38OTTDavid Legwand: Tripping2 min
  15. P3 19:26OTTChris Neil: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Zibanejad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINOTT
35Shots on goal17
2.1Expected goals1.7
54Shot attempts40
30Faceoffs won29
3Power plays5
29Penalty minutes15
26Hits36
12Blocked shots13
9Giveaways14
6Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Zucker – Coyle12:56

    xG 0.67–0.18 (79%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Veilleux – Brodziak – Carter3:47

    xG 0.28–0.12 (69%)attempts 6–3goals 0–1

  3. Haula – Niederreiter – Fontaine7:02

    xG 0.09–0.03 (78%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  4. Pominville – Vanek – Granlund13:35

    xG 0.55–0.51 (52%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Brodin12:01

    xG 0.49–0.09 (85%)attempts 11–4goals 0–1

  2. Suter – Prosser2:41

    xG 0.30–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Dumba3:46

    xG 0.31–0.11 (74%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestMacArthur – Ryan – Turris10:39

    xG 0.45–0.24 (65%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  2. Legwand – Neil – Smith10:43

    xG 0.17–0.21 (44%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Hoffman – Stone – Lazar8:15

    xG 0.28–0.58 (33%)attempts 6–9goals 2–0

  4. Michalek – Chiasson – Zibanejad9:31

    xG 0.00–0.52 (0%)attempts 1–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Cowen2:00

    xG 0.16–0.01 (94%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  2. Karlsson – Borowiecki12:10

    xG 0.18–0.18 (50%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  3. Gryba – Cowen6:02

    xG 0.03–0.12 (17%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 1.7 xGMIN 2.1 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 6/100 · #1150 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.64 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

OTT winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).