Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Nov 9, 2014·United Center, Chicago

San Jose Sharks 2, Chicago Blackhawks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS19113012234
CHI32006211537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:00CHIKris VersteegAssists: Trevor van Riemsdyk, Jonathan Toews · Slap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:10CHIBrent SeabrookAssists: Brad Richards, Peter Regin · Slap, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P1 14:34CHINiklas HjalmarssonGWGAssists: Marian Hossa, Marcus Kruger · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P1 15:32SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Justin Braun, Joe Thornton · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:51SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Joe Thornton, Patrick Marleau · Snap, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 15:18CHIBryan BickellAssists: Johnny Oduya, Brandon Saad · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:03CHIJonathan ToewsENAssists: Patrick Kane, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.60 xG2–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P2 2:57CHIAndrew Shaw: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  2. P3 4:57SJSJason Demers: High sticking2 min
  3. P3 9:06CHIDavid Rundblad: Holding2 min
  4. P3 18:03SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Fighting5 min
  5. P3 18:03CHIKris Versteeg: Fighting5 min
  6. P3 18:03CHIKris Versteeg: Slashing2 min
  7. P3 18:03SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 18:26CHIJeremy Morin: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 18:26SJSAdam Burish: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 18:26SJSAdam Burish: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 18:59SJSBrent Burns: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 19:04SJSScott Hannan: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thornton won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSCHI
34Shots on goal37
2.3Expected goals3.0
59Shot attempts53
31Faceoffs won34
3Power plays3
20Penalty minutes18
29Hits13
10Blocked shots17
4Giveaways8
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Pavelski – Nieto10:17

    xG 0.42–0.18 (70%)attempts 14–9goals 1–1

  2. Burish – Desjardins – Goodrow5:54

    xG 0.25–0.22 (53%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  3. Marleau – Couture – Wingels12:00

    xG 0.31–0.60 (34%)attempts 6–15goals 0–1

  4. Kennedy – Sheppard – Hertl11:14

    xG 0.23–0.60 (28%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Vlasic – Braun15:55

    xG 0.41–0.50 (45%)attempts 13–14goals 1–0

  2. Hannan – Demers12:49

    xG 0.43–0.59 (42%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  3. Burns – Mueller16:24

    xG 0.25–0.88 (22%)attempts 14–19goals 0–3

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBickell – Shaw – Saad8:42

    xG 0.67–0.25 (73%)attempts 10–8goals 1–1

  2. Versteeg – Toews – Kane13:52

    xG 0.70–0.33 (68%)attempts 16–11goals 1–0

  3. Richards – Regin – Morin5:31

    xG 0.22–0.08 (74%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  4. Hossa – Smith – Kruger10:49

    xG 0.40–0.30 (57%)attempts 14–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeabrook – Rundblad9:36

    xG 0.64–0.10 (86%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  2. Oduya – Hjalmarsson19:21

    xG 0.70–0.35 (66%)attempts 23–11goals 2–0

  3. Oduya – Seabrook2:03

    xG 0.07–0.16 (32%)attempts 1–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.0 xGSJS 2.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #338 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.98 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 65% of the time.

CHI winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).