Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 13, 2014·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

Nashville Predators 3, St. Louis Blues 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

STL winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH1102906325
STL2121718427

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:25STLT.J. OshiePPAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Jori Lehtera · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:45STLCarl GunnarssonAssists: Maxim Lapierre, Steve Ott · Slap, 0.04 xG0–2
  3. P1 13:21NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: James Neal, Roman Josi · Slap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:41NSHShea WeberAssists: Filip Forsberg, Roman Josi · Slap, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:18STLVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Jori Lehtera, Jaden Schwartz · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P2 19:59NSHRoman JosiPPAssists: Shea Weber, Filip Forsberg · Slap, 0.04 xG3–3
  7. P3 14:06STLPaul StastnyGWGAssists: Kevin Shattenkirk, Carl Gunnarsson · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 1:56NSHOlli Jokinen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 3:59STLSteve Ott: Interference2 min
  3. P1 7:11STLJoakim Lindstrom: Interference2 min
  4. P2 6:46NSHEric Nystrom: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 6:46STLKevin Shattenkirk: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 6:46NSHRyan Ellis: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 6:46STLVladimir Tarasenko: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 7:51STLDavid Backes: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 7:51STLSteve Ott: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P2 7:51NSHJames Neal: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P2 13:16STLRyan Reaves: Misconduct10 min
  12. P2 19:39STLT.J. Oshie: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  13. P3 8:42NSHJames Neal: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Ribeiro
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHSTL
25Shots on goal27
1.9Expected goals1.7
57Shot attempts40
31Faceoffs won43
4Power plays2
13Penalty minutes27
16Hits19
8Blocked shots21
4Giveaways3
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestJokinen – Smith – Jarnkrok8:23

    xG 0.59–0.22 (73%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  2. Cullen – Gaustad – Nystrom4:23

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Roy – Beck – Bourque5:46

    xG 0.09–0.06 (58%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

  4. Jokinen – Bourque – Jarnkrok3:01

    xG 0.02–0.07 (22%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm12:44

    xG 0.44–0.25 (64%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  2. Volchenkov – Jones9:59

    xG 0.43–0.36 (54%)attempts 14–4goals 0–1

  3. Weber – Josi21:36

    xG 0.67–0.68 (50%)attempts 16–20goals 2–2

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestBackes – Oshie – Berglund10:45

    xG 0.33–0.15 (69%)attempts 11–11goals 0–1

  2. Steen – Backes – Oshie4:26

    xG 0.02–0.02 (52%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Lindstrom – Steen – Stastny6:33

    xG 0.11–0.13 (47%)attempts 3–3goals 1–1

  4. Ott – Lapierre – Reaves3:56

    xG 0.13–0.20 (40%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Pietrangelo17:59

    xG 0.85–0.72 (54%)attempts 13–21goals 0–2

  2. Shattenkirk – Gunnarsson13:43

    xG 0.30–0.23 (57%)attempts 10–6goals 3–0

  3. Jackman – Cole10:52

    xG 0.05–0.35 (13%)attempts 4–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 1.7 xGNSH 1.9 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #208 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.94 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 49% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 54% of the time.

STL winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).