Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 13, 2014·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Buffalo Sabres 3, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 94% of the time.

MIN winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF2501518328
MIN42011118639

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:03BUFRasmus RistolainenAssists: Matt Moulson, Zemgus Girgensons · Deflected, 0.01 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:07MINRyan CarterAssists: Kyle Brodziak, Justin Fontaine · Deflected, 0.43 xG1–1
  3. P1 6:14MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P1 6:24BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Tyler Ennis, Nikita Zadorov · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P1 9:21MINKyle BrodziakAssists: Justin Fontaine, Ryan Carter · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–3
  6. P1 17:52MINNino NiederreiterPPGWGAssists: Mikael Granlund, Mathew Dumba · Tip-in, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P2 13:50MINJared SpurgeonPPAssists: Jason Pominville, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–5
  8. P3 12:56BUFTorrey MitchellAssists: Drew Stafford, Nicolas Deslauriers · Snap, 0.10 xG3–5
  9. P3 17:32MINNino NiederreiterENAssists: Charlie Coyle, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.63 xG3–6
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 12:35BUFTyler Myers: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 17:34BUFDrew Stafford: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:51BUFPatrick Kaleta: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 11:56BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 14:37MINJustin Fontaine: Holding2 min
  6. P3 9:25MINJordan Schroeder: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Stafford
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFMIN
28Shots on goal39
1.4Expected goals4.9
38Shot attempts78
25Faceoffs won31
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes4
22Hits12
21Blocked shots6
6Giveaways5
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. McCormick – Stafford – Deslauriers4:12

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  2. Kaleta – Stewart – Hodgson2:32

    xG 0.07–0.14 (33%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Gionta – Mitchell – Flynn10:40

    xG 0.16–0.28 (37%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  4. Gionta – Mitchell – Deslauriers2:08

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStrachan – Zadorov3:00

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 1–0

  2. Strachan – Myers7:45

    xG 0.12–0.31 (29%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

  3. Strachan – Weber5:35

    xG 0.07–0.53 (12%)attempts 2–9goals 0–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestBrodziak – Carter – Fontaine7:12

    xG 0.82–0.03 (97%)attempts 7–3goals 2–0

  2. Coyle – Granlund – Niederreiter13:24

    xG 0.76–0.06 (93%)attempts 17–4goals 1–1

  3. Koivu – Pominville – Zucker11:08

    xG 0.80–0.39 (67%)attempts 15–9goals 0–1

  4. Vanek – Schroeder – Haula10:39

    xG 0.41–0.17 (71%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Spurgeon20:02

    xG 1.03–0.33 (76%)attempts 25–12goals 0–1

  2. Ballard – Prosser7:30

    xG 0.78–0.16 (83%)attempts 8–5goals 2–1

  3. Dumba – Folin5:27

    xG 0.72–0.19 (79%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 4.9 xGBUF 1.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #259 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.27 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 94% of the time.

MIN winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).