Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 20, 2014·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Florida Panthers 3, San Jose Sharks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 78% of the time.

SJS winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
FLA1619010032328
SJS01211313021230

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:24FLANick BjugstadAssists: Dmitry Kulikov, Jonathan Huberdeau · Deflected, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P2 6:19SJSLogan CouturePPAssists: Joe Pavelski, Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.30 xG1–1
  3. P2 17:23FLANick BjugstadPPAssists: Erik Gudbranson, Jonathan Huberdeau · Slap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P3 19:26SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Joe Thornton, Tomas Hertl · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. SJS Joe Pavelski stopped
  2. 2. FLA Jonathan Huberdeau stopped
  3. 3. SJS Logan Couture scored
  4. 4. FLA Jussi Jokinen scored
  5. 5. SJS Brent Burns stopped
  6. 6. FLA Nick Bjugstad scored
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 18:07SJSAndrew Desjardins: Holding2 min
  2. P2 4:41FLADmitry Kulikov: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 13:16FLAWillie Mitchell: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 15:56SJSTommy Wingels: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  5. P3 0:54SJSJustin Braun: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 6:45FLAJussi Jokinen: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 10:38SJSBrent Burns: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 19:49SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thornton won the faceoff against Bjugstad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLASJS
28Shots on goal30
1.5Expected goals3.0
63Shot attempts70
31Faceoffs won43
5Power plays3
6Penalty minutes10
20Hits27
26Blocked shots20
13Giveaways19
7Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestFleischmann – Grimaldi – Barkov10:02

    xG 0.46–0.13 (78%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  2. Jokinen – Hayes – Trocheck6:47

    xG 0.05–0.12 (31%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  3. Boyes – Bjugstad – Huberdeau11:18

    xG 0.14–0.43 (24%)attempts 8–17goals 1–0

  4. Thornton – MacKenzie – Kopecky8:37

    xG 0.02–0.36 (6%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMitchell – Kulikov16:15

    xG 0.30–0.21 (58%)attempts 16–18goals 1–0

  2. Olsen – Gudbranson12:07

    xG 0.25–0.33 (43%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

  3. Campbell – Ekblad14:32

    xG 0.26–0.53 (33%)attempts 12–23goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestThornton – Marleau – Hertl10:43

    xG 0.43–0.08 (84%)attempts 19–8goals 0–1

  2. Sheppard – Wingels – Goodrow11:17

    xG 0.18–0.13 (58%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  3. Kennedy – Desjardins – McGinn7:14

    xG 0.10–0.06 (63%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  4. Pavelski – Couture – Nieto9:31

    xG 0.24–0.24 (50%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun14:16

    xG 0.47–0.13 (78%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1

  2. Hannan – Burns13:52

    xG 0.24–0.22 (52%)attempts 20–11goals 0–0

  3. Demers – Mueller11:33

    xG 0.23–0.22 (52%)attempts 15–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 3.0 xGFLA 1.5 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #229 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.13 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 78% of the time.

SJS winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).