Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 28, 2014·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Minnesota Wild 5, Dallas Stars 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN2111811213534
DAL0931612000445

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:41MINNino NiederreiterAssists: Thomas Vanek · Slap, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:29MINJason ZuckerAssists: Nate Prosser, Mikko Koivu · Backhand, 0.27 xG2–0
  3. P2 11:47MINMikael GranlundAssists: Jason Pominville, Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–0
  4. P2 16:18DALAles HemskyAssists: Shawn Horcoff, Jyrki Jokipakka · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P2 18:50DALTyler SeguinAssists: Jamie Benn, Jyrki Jokipakka · Deflected, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P2 19:49DALErik ColeAssists: Trevor Daley, Jason Demers · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–3
  7. P3 13:29DALAlex GoligoskiAssists: Tyler Seguin, Jamie Benn · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–4
  8. P3 18:08MINThomas VanekAssists: Ryan Suter, Zach Parise · Snap, 0.08 xG4–4
  9. OT 2:04MINMarco ScandellaGWGAssists: Zach Parise, Thomas Vanek · Tip-in, 0.12 xG5–4
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:30DALJamie Oleksiak: Kneeing2 min
  2. P1 5:16MINMikko Koivu: Interference2 min
  3. P2 6:09MINKyle Brodziak: Cross checking2 min
  4. P3 5:32DALCody Eakin: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 5:32MINErik Haula: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 9:05MINMarco Scandella: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Seguin won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINDAL
34Shots on goal45
2.7Expected goals2.5
61Shot attempts77
30Faceoffs won45
1Power plays3
8Penalty minutes4
16Hits17
19Blocked shots13
10Giveaways16
10Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Parise – Granlund13:09

    xG 0.51–0.30 (63%)attempts 25–16goals 1–0

  2. Vanek – Brodziak – Niederreiter11:22

    xG 0.43–0.48 (47%)attempts 8–15goals 1–1

  3. Koivu – Zucker – Coyle11:18

    xG 0.61–0.78 (44%)attempts 9–21goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Prosser4:05

    xG 0.21–0.01 (94%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  2. Scandella – Brodin12:43

    xG 0.65–0.54 (55%)attempts 8–14goals 1–0

  3. Suter – Prosser2:05

    xG 0.04–0.12 (25%)attempts 2–3goals 0–1

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestBenn – Eakin – Seguin9:38

    xG 0.67–0.22 (76%)attempts 17–7goals 2–0

  2. Eaves – Benn – Seguin3:25

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  3. Horcoff – Moen – Hemsky5:37

    xG 0.22–0.05 (83%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  4. Cole – Spezza – Sceviour5:39

    xG 0.17–0.13 (56%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokipakka – Oleksiak11:52

    xG 0.50–0.39 (56%)attempts 14–9goals 1–1

  2. Goligoski – Klingberg18:23

    xG 0.73–0.82 (47%)attempts 22–16goals 1–2

  3. Daley – Demers15:07

    xG 0.58–0.70 (45%)attempts 25–21goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 2.5 xGMIN 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #5 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.61 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +45 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 53% of the time.

DAL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).