Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 29, 2014·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Carolina Hurricanes 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 51% of the time.

CAR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT21401118333
CAR110014110234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:39CARJustin FaulkPPAssists: Victor Rask, Nathan Gerbe · Slap, 0.05 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:56PITChris KunitzAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Blake Comeau · Snap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P1 5:32PITRobert BortuzzoAssists: Paul Martin, Andrew Ebbett · Snap, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P3 15:27PITChristian EhrhoffGWGAssists: Olli Maatta · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–1
  5. P3 19:48CARElias LindholmPPAssists: Victor Rask, Eric Staal · Deflected, 0.05 xG3–2
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:17PITRobert Bortuzzo: Roughing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:42PITJayson Megna: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 10:42CARNathan Gerbe: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 10:42PITJayson Megna: Cross checking2 min
  5. P1 18:47CARJohn-Michael Liles: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 5:29PITEvgeni Malkin: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 9:06CARJay Harrison: Delaying game2 min
  8. P2 11:33PITSidney Crosby: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 17:09PITBlake Comeau: Boarding2 min
  10. P2 18:15CARElias Lindholm: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 15:50PITBlake Comeau: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 15:50CARNathan Gerbe: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 18:31PITNick Spaling: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Rask
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCAR
33Shots on goal34
2.8Expected goals2.9
49Shot attempts62
23Faceoffs won43
3Power plays6
16Penalty minutes10
38Hits23
17Blocked shots10
7Giveaways8
8Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Malkin – Comeau10:29

    xG 0.79–0.03 (97%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  2. Crosby – Hornqvist – Spaling9:33

    xG 0.45–0.26 (63%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  3. Adams – Ebbett – Sill3:44

    xG 0.06–0.11 (34%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Downie – Sutter – Megna7:44

    xG 0.07–0.37 (16%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Bortuzzo10:15

    xG 0.89–0.19 (83%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  2. Scuderi – Despres13:42

    xG 0.66–0.22 (75%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  3. Ehrhoff – Maatta15:15

    xG 0.30–0.69 (30%)attempts 12–15goals 1–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Tlusty – Lindholm5:07

    xG 0.52–0.38 (57%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

  2. Semin – Staal – Tlusty3:30

    xG 0.03–0.06 (34%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Gerbe – Nash – Lindholm3:53

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Semin – Gerbe – Nash5:28

    xG 0.21–0.42 (34%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGleason – Jordan6:23

    xG 0.53–0.06 (90%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  2. Hainsey – Sekera2:25

    xG 0.01–0.05 (18%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Liles – Harrison2:07

    xG 0.05–0.12 (31%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 2.9 xGPIT 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 35/100 · #760 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.17 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 51% of the time.

CAR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).