Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 4, 2014·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Buffalo Sabres 0, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 86% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF050305013
TBL18314113535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:33TBLRadko GudasGWGAssists: Tyler Johnson · Tip-in, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:28TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Ryan Callahan, Alex Killorn · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P2 5:39TBLBrenden MorrowAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Andrej Sustr · Wrist, 0.21 xG0–3
  4. P2 13:40TBLJason GarrisonAssists: Steven Stamkos, Andrej Sustr · Slap, 0.03 xG0–4
  5. P3 18:55TBLBrett ConnollyPPAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–5
Penalties (25)
  1. P1 3:55TBLVictor Hedman: Holding2 min
  2. P2 0:45BUFNikita Zadorov: Hooking2 min
  3. P3 2:46TBLTyler Johnson: Holding2 min
  4. P3 6:42BUFMarcus Foligno: Roughing2 min
  5. P3 7:54TBLRyan Callahan: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 7:54BUFTyson Strachan: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 7:54TBLSteven Stamkos: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 7:54TBLSteven Stamkos: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 7:54BUFMike Weber: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 7:54BUFMike Weber: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 7:54TBLBrett Connolly: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 8:58TBLCedric Paquette: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 8:58BUFZemgus Girgensons: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 8:58TBLVictor Hedman: Interference2 min
  15. P3 8:58BUFNikita Zadorov: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 8:58TBLVictor Hedman: Misconduct10 min
  17. P3 8:58BUFNikita Zadorov: Misconduct10 min
  18. P3 11:25BUFCody McCormick: Cross checking2 min
  19. P3 11:25BUFCody McCormick: Misconduct10 min
  20. P3 11:25TBLBrian Boyle: Misconduct10 min
  21. P3 11:25BUFPatrick Kaleta: Misconduct10 min
  22. P3 11:25TBLBrenden Morrow: Misconduct10 min
  23. P3 14:18BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  24. P3 17:52BUFMike Weber: Tripping2 min · PPG
  25. P3 18:17BUFTyler Myers: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Boyle won the faceoff against Mitchell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFTBL
13Shots on goal35
1.3Expected goals3.4
29Shot attempts68
25Faceoffs won26
3Power plays6
58Penalty minutes52
26Hits22
17Blocked shots7
6Giveaways9
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Gionta – Mitchell – Flynn12:17

    xG 0.19–0.31 (38%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  2. Stewart – Hodgson – Foligno5:45

    xG 0.03–0.24 (10%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. McCormick – Kaleta – Deslauriers4:15

    xG 0.02–0.34 (4%)attempts 1–6goals 0–1

  4. Moulson – Ennis – Girgensons10:11

    xG 0.36–0.82 (31%)attempts 7–17goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGorges – Ristolainen2:32

    xG 0.14–0.04 (78%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Weber – Zadorov2:31

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Gorges – Myers12:41

    xG 0.17–0.23 (42%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestJohnson – Palat – Kucherov11:40

    xG 0.86–0.24 (78%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Filppula – Connolly – Paquette9:14

    xG 0.46–0.11 (81%)attempts 13–2goals 0–0

  3. Morrow – Boyle – Drouin7:52

    xG 0.37–0.02 (95%)attempts 10–3goals 1–0

  4. Callahan – Killorn – Stamkos10:07

    xG 0.43–0.13 (76%)attempts 11–5goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGarrison – Sustr12:54

    xG 1.11–0.32 (78%)attempts 18–7goals 2–0

  2. Carle – Gudas14:28

    xG 0.76–0.10 (88%)attempts 18–7goals 2–0

  3. Stralman – Hedman12:55

    xG 0.22–0.11 (66%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.4 xGBUF 1.3 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1184 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.55 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 86% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).