Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Dec 5, 2014·United Center, Chicago

Montréal Canadiens 3, Chicago Blackhawks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

CHI winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL114211016341
CHI212012212436

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:13CHIMichal RozsivalAssists: Bryan Bickell, Andrew Shaw · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 18:16CHIBen SmithAssists: Marcus Kruger, Joakim Nordstrom · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:42MTLBrendan GallagherAssists: Alex Galchenyuk, Tomas Plekanec · Slap, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:58MTLSergei GoncharAssists: Brendan Gallagher, Alexei Emelin · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:22MTLP.K. SubbanPPAssists: Andrei Markov, David Desharnais · Slap, 0.05 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:18CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Brad Richards, Kris Versteeg · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:33CHIBrandon SaadGWGAssists: Patrick Kane, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–4
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 14:52CHIAndrew Shaw: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 19:11MTLSergei Gonchar: Interference2 min
  3. P2 0:16MTLP.K. Subban: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P2 1:59CHIBrad Richards: Interference2 min
  5. P2 13:40CHIMarian Hossa: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 17:09CHIPatrick Kane: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 0:00MTLAlexei Emelin: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 4:05MTLP.K. Subban: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Plekanec
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLCHI
41Shots on goal36
2.9Expected goals3.0
61Shot attempts64
31Faceoffs won33
3Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
19Hits15
20Blocked shots11
8Giveaways7
1Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestDesharnais – Pacioretty – Weise13:24

    xG 0.74–0.26 (74%)attempts 15–12goals 0–1

  2. Plekanec – Gallagher – Galchenyuk12:56

    xG 0.90–0.43 (67%)attempts 18–11goals 2–1

  3. Parenteau – Prust – Sekac3:28

    xG 0.35–0.04 (90%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Malhotra – Prust – Tangradi4:11

    xG 0.18–0.06 (76%)attempts 4–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMarkov – Subban18:13

    xG 1.68–0.56 (75%)attempts 27–15goals 1–1

  2. Gilbert – Emelin4:47

    xG 0.31–0.14 (68%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Weaver – Gilbert5:48

    xG 0.12–0.18 (40%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSmith – Kruger – Nordstrom9:17

    xG 0.47–0.37 (56%)attempts 13–8goals 1–1

  2. Richards – Versteeg – Kane10:44

    xG 0.19–0.41 (32%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  3. Hossa – Toews – Saad12:17

    xG 0.30–0.73 (29%)attempts 10–13goals 0–1

  4. Carcillo – Bickell – Shaw8:41

    xG 0.14–0.90 (13%)attempts 6–14goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Keith – Hjalmarsson3:01

    xG 0.22–0.29 (43%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  2. Oduya – Hjalmarsson13:15

    xG 0.34–0.43 (44%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

  3. Keith – Seabrook15:25

    xG 0.37–0.61 (37%)attempts 14–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 3.0 xGMTL 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #218 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.91 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +48 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 52% of the time.

CHI winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).