Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 7, 2014·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

Anaheim Ducks 4, Winnipeg Jets 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 68% of the time.

WPG winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ANA19270811425
WPG114181701330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:02ANARene BourquePPAssists: Patrick Maroon, Ryan Getzlaf · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:28WPGDustin ByfuglienPPAssists: Mathieu Perreault, Andrew Ladd · Snap, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:33WPGAndrew LaddPPAssists: Blake Wheeler, Jacob Trouba · Snap, 0.37 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:35ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Clayton Stoner, Rickard Rakell · Deflected, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:53ANARyan KeslerPPAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Cam Fowler · Snap, 0.15 xG3–2
  6. P3 15:15WPGJacob TroubaAssists: Adam Lowry, Mark Stuart · Backhand, 0.26 xG3–3
  7. OT 0:53ANAKyle PalmieriGWGAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Hampus Lindholm · Snap, 0.08 xG4–3
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 7:09ANAJosh Manson: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 10:19WPGDustin Byfuglien: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:54ANAJosh Manson: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P1 17:45WPGMark Stuart: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 19:57ANAJakob Silfverberg: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 6:56WPGBen Chiarot: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 7:19WPGJacob Trouba: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 8:13ANAMatt Beleskey: Interference2 min
  9. P2 19:49WPGEvander Kane: Checking from behind5 min
  10. P2 19:49WPGEvander Kane: Game misconduct10 min
  11. P2 19:49ANAClayton Stoner: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 4:56ANASami Vatanen: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 7:06ANARene Bourque: Too many men on the ice2 min
  14. P3 10:41WPGPaul Postma: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Rakell won the faceoff against Scheifele
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAWPG
25Shots on goal30
2.7Expected goals3.8
44Shot attempts68
31Faceoffs won30
6Power plays6
14Penalty minutes25
20Hits34
20Blocked shots12
15Giveaways8
8Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. Kesler – Beleskey – Palmieri7:27

    xG 0.29–0.32 (47%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  2. Cogliano – Silfverberg – Rakell6:23

    xG 0.18–0.33 (35%)attempts 3–7goals 1–0

  3. Jackman – Thompson – Maroon6:19

    xG 0.39–0.54 (42%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  4. Getzlaf – Bourque – Smith-Pelly8:28

    xG 0.22–0.60 (27%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStoner – Vatanen10:03

    xG 0.24–0.14 (63%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

  2. Fowler – Manson9:54

    xG 0.52–0.61 (46%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Robak – Lindholm11:05

    xG 0.34–0.83 (29%)attempts 8–14goals 0–1

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestFrolik – Perreault – Kane7:11

    xG 0.50–0.07 (88%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. Halischuk – Lowry – Scheifele7:30

    xG 0.28–0.12 (70%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  3. Ladd – Wheeler – Little9:54

    xG 0.33–0.21 (61%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  4. Frolik – Perreault – Scheifele3:16

    xG 0.18–0.42 (30%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStuart – Trouba10:29

    xG 0.62–0.30 (67%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  2. Byfuglien – Chiarot13:42

    xG 0.60–0.48 (56%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  3. Byfuglien – Trouba2:01

    xG 0.16–0.05 (76%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 3.8 xGANA 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #96 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.45 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Winnipeg Jets win this game 68% of the time.

WPG winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).