Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 16, 2014·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

Buffalo Sabres 1, Winnipeg Jets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

WPG winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF11205011128
WPG08312216536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:16BUFNikita ZadorovPPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Cody Hodgson · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P2 9:31WPGMark ScheifeleAssists: Grant Clitsome, Evander Kane · Snap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:35WPGMichael FrolikSHGWGAssists: Jim Slater · Snap, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:17WPGMark ScheifeleAssists: Mathieu Perreault, Michael Frolik · Snap, 0.15 xG1–3
  5. P3 1:11WPGEvander KanePPAssists: Blake Wheeler, Mark Scheifele · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–4
  6. P3 12:39WPGChris ThorburnAssists: Anthony Peluso, Mark Stuart · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 2:04BUFBrian Flynn: Interference2 min
  2. P1 12:30WPGGrant Clitsome: Interference2 min
  3. P1 12:41WPGAdam Pardy: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 17:34WPGBlake Wheeler: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 7:31BUFNikita Zadorov: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P2 11:24WPGMark Scheifele: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P2 19:31BUFAndre Benoit: Slashing2 min · PPG
  8. P3 16:06WPGMark Stuart: Interference2 min
  9. P3 16:06WPGMark Stuart: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 16:06BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 16:06BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 17:02BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Grigorenko won the faceoff against Lowry
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFWPG
28Shots on goal36
3.8Expected goals3.3
45Shot attempts69
27Faceoffs won30
4Power plays4
15Penalty minutes15
23Hits31
20Blocked shots8
16Giveaways11
6Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestKaleta – Stewart – Hodgson2:24

    xG 0.25–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Gionta – Foligno – Flynn8:50

    xG 0.31–0.17 (65%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  3. Kaleta – Stewart – Foligno2:21

    xG 0.15–0.03 (83%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Moulson – Ennis – Girgensons9:36

    xG 0.18–0.30 (38%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Strachan – Meszaros7:02

    xG 0.14–0.16 (46%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  2. Myers – Zadorov14:10

    xG 0.44–0.64 (41%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1

  3. Strachan – Myers3:39

    xG 0.01–0.23 (5%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestFrolik – Perreault – Scheifele10:17

    xG 0.68–0.27 (72%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  2. Ladd – Wheeler – Little11:19

    xG 0.54–0.14 (80%)attempts 10–3goals 0–0

  3. Thorburn – Slater – Peluso5:17

    xG 0.37–0.01 (97%)attempts 11–2goals 1–0

  4. Halischuk – Kane – Lowry10:45

    xG 0.43–0.47 (48%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPardy – Clitsome14:15

    xG 0.88–0.32 (73%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  2. Stuart – Postma13:24

    xG 0.74–0.37 (66%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

  3. Byfuglien – Chiarot15:32

    xG 0.56–0.24 (70%)attempts 16–5goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 3.3 xGBUF 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 36/100 · #741 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.21 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

WPG winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).