Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Dec 20, 2014·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Nashville Predators 6, Minnesota Wild 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
NSH31401421313644
MIN261821201527

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:10MINJason ZuckerAssists: Jason Pominville, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.19 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:37NSHCalle JarnkrokAssists: Shea Weber, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P1 6:37MINZach PariseAssists: Charlie Coyle, Thomas Vanek · Deflected, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P1 13:58NSHMatt CullenAssists: Victor Bartley, Mike Fisher · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P1 18:14NSHCraig SmithAssists: Mike Ribeiro · Backhand, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P2 7:18MINMarco ScandellaPPAssists: Charlie Coyle, Zach Parise · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–3
  7. P3 1:48NSHFilip ForsbergAssists: Victor Bartley, Craig Smith · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–3
  8. P3 9:05NSHRoman JosiPPAssists: Shea Weber, Matt Cullen · Slap, 0.02 xG5–3
  9. P3 10:46MINZach ParisePPAssists: Jason Pominville, Ryan Suter · Tip-in, 0.11 xG5–4
  10. P3 19:12MINThomas VanekAssists: Marco Scandella, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.25 xG5–5
  11. OT 1:45NSHMattias EkholmGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.11 xG6–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 8:19MINRyan Carter: Interference2 min
  2. P2 0:42MINJonas Brodin: Holding2 min
  3. P2 4:55MINMikko Koivu: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 6:36NSHMike Fisher: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 6:36NSHMike Fisher: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 3:42NSHVictor Bartley: Interference2 min
  7. P3 7:14MINCharlie Coyle: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 9:51NSHOlli Jokinen: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Coyle won the faceoff against Jokinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHMIN
44Shots on goal27
2.2Expected goals2.4
78Shot attempts56
40Faceoffs won43
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
10Hits12
14Blocked shots21
5Giveaways7
0Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestRoy – Beck – Jarnkrok4:26

    xG 0.31–0.13 (70%)attempts 8–2goals 1–0

  2. Ribeiro – Smith – Forsberg11:24

    xG 0.46–0.30 (61%)attempts 18–7goals 2–0

  3. Cullen – Fisher – Wilson10:58

    xG 0.52–0.48 (52%)attempts 13–12goals 1–2

  4. Jokinen – Nystrom – Bourque11:11

    xG 0.12–0.19 (40%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Josi16:55

    xG 0.39–0.29 (57%)attempts 21–9goals 1–0

  2. Ellis – Ekholm15:45

    xG 0.61–0.54 (53%)attempts 20–19goals 1–1

  3. Bartley – Jones9:51

    xG 0.31–0.31 (50%)attempts 10–9goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestVanek – Parise – Coyle11:40

    xG 0.35–0.22 (61%)attempts 11–13goals 1–0

  2. Koivu – Pominville – Zucker11:06

    xG 0.37–0.34 (52%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

  3. Koivu – Pominville – Parise2:11

    xG 0.01–0.00 (70%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Brodziak – Carter – Fontaine4:29

    xG 0.18–0.19 (48%)attempts 6–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Spurgeon15:00

    xG 0.70–0.64 (53%)attempts 17–17goals 2–1

  2. Prosser – Folin4:32

    xG 0.24–0.18 (56%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  3. Suter – Brodin19:12

    xG 0.17–0.45 (28%)attempts 10–23goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.4 xGNSH 2.2 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #3 of 1230 this seasonSwing 3.16 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 56% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).