Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 23, 2014·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Philadelphia Flyers 5, Minnesota Wild 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 72% of the time.

MIN winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI28111211530
MIN1711007224

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:16PHISean CouturierAssists: R.J. Umberger · Deflected, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:33PHIClaude GirouxAssists: Luke Schenn, Jakub Voracek · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–0
  3. P1 10:03MINMarco ScandellaAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Zach Parise · Slap, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:43MINCharlie CoylePPAssists: Jason Pominville, Ryan Suter · Deflected, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 15:22PHIWayne SimmondsGWGAssists: Brayden Schenn, Mark Streit · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 5:29PHIVincent LecavalierAssists: Andrew MacDonald, Pierre-Edouard Bellemare · Tip-in, 0.10 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:31PHIMichael RafflENAssists: Jakub Voracek · Wrist, 0.62 xG5–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 16:28PHIScott Laughton: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 0:14PHINicklas Grossmann: Boarding2 min
  3. P2 3:23PHIBrayden Schenn: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  4. P2 6:51PHIJakub Voracek: Holding2 min
  5. P3 11:28PHIAndrew MacDonald: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 14:10MINCharlie Coyle: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 0:00PHIChris VandeVelde: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 0:00MINRyan Carter: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← PHI attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIMIN
30Shots on goal24
2.9Expected goals1.7
47Shot attempts50
34Faceoffs won35
1Power plays5
12Penalty minutes4
23Hits19
15Blocked shots11
2Giveaways9
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestGiroux – Voracek – Raffl12:15

    xG 0.64–0.27 (70%)attempts 14–5goals 1–0

  2. Lecavalier – VandeVelde – Bellemare8:50

    xG 0.35–0.23 (61%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  3. Simmonds – Schenn – Laughton8:15

    xG 0.21–0.24 (47%)attempts 9–7goals 1–0

  4. Umberger – Read – Couturier8:34

    xG 0.07–0.10 (43%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStreit – Grossmann14:43

    xG 0.54–0.28 (66%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  2. MacDonald – Schenn16:10

    xG 0.61–0.44 (58%)attempts 13–12goals 3–0

  3. Schultz – Coburn12:52

    xG 0.24–0.24 (50%)attempts 14–9goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestCooke – Coyle – Niederreiter6:44

    xG 0.16–0.04 (78%)attempts 6–2goals 0–1

  2. Cooke – Koivu – Zucker3:36

    xG 0.09–0.02 (81%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Parise – Granlund2:46

    xG 0.02–0.04 (30%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Vanek – Coyle – Niederreiter2:50

    xG 0.04–0.10 (30%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Suter – Brodin18:18

    xG 0.51–0.61 (46%)attempts 14–19goals 0–2

  2. Falk – Folin4:07

    xG 0.10–0.28 (26%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

  3. Scandella – Spurgeon14:55

    xG 0.17–0.43 (28%)attempts 15–13goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 1.7 xGPHI 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 70/100 · #314 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.37 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 72% of the time.

MIN winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).