Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Dec 31, 2014·TD Garden, Boston

Toronto Maple Leafs 4, Boston Bruins 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 68% of the time.

BOS winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TOR1821102002421
BOS073809041328

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:22TORLeo KomarovAssists: Peter Holland · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:17BOSCarl SoderbergPPAssists: Reilly Smith, Dougie Hamilton · Backhand, 0.53 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:48TORJames van RiemsdykAssists: Phil Kessel · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:45TORPhil KesselPPAssists: Dion Phaneuf, Cody Franson · Snap, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P2 15:28BOSDavid KrejciAssists: Milan Lucic, Seth Griffith · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 17:31BOSTorey KrugAssists: Loui Eriksson, Chris Kelly · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. TOR Mike Santorelli scored
  2. 2. BOS Reilly Smith stopped
  3. 3. TOR Tyler Bozak stopped
  4. 4. BOS Torey Krug scored
  5. 5. TOR James van Riemsdyk stopped
  6. 6. BOS Brad Marchand stopped
  7. 7. TOR Peter Holland stopped
  8. 8. BOS Seth Griffith stopped
  9. 9. TOR Nazem Kadri scored
  10. 10. BOS David Krejci stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 8:13BOSDougie Hamilton: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 9:13TORJames van Riemsdyk: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 9:13BOSZdeno Chara: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 17:51BOSZdeno Chara: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  5. P1 19:19TORRoman Polak: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 9:08BOSKevan Miller: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P3 0:06TORJames van Riemsdyk: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BOS
46% to win54% to win
← TOR attackBOS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bozak won the faceoff against Bergeron
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORBOS
21Shots on goal28
2.5Expected goals3.6
46Shot attempts65
27Faceoffs won36
2Power plays2
6Penalty minutes6
36Hits26
22Blocked shots10
9Giveaways5
7Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestLupul – Winnik – Kadri5:16

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Clarkson – Booth – Smith8:13

    xG 0.18–0.08 (70%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Clarkson – Winnik – Kadri6:16

    xG 0.12–0.07 (64%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Santorelli – Komarov – Holland8:42

    xG 0.30–0.54 (36%)attempts 5–11goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolzer – Gardiner15:38

    xG 0.57–0.50 (53%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  2. Polak – Gardiner2:51

    xG 0.07–0.10 (40%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Polak – Rielly15:59

    xG 0.36–0.41 (47%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestBergeron – Marchand – Smith12:19

    xG 0.52–0.24 (68%)attempts 14–5goals 0–1

  2. Kelly – Eriksson – Soderberg12:33

    xG 0.27–0.19 (59%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  3. Krejci – Lucic – Griffith11:50

    xG 0.43–0.35 (55%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  4. Campbell – Paille – Cunningham8:23

    xG 0.02–0.36 (6%)attempts 1–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Hamilton12:45

    xG 0.81–0.34 (71%)attempts 17–4goals 0–1

  2. Seidenberg – Miller2:29

    xG 0.20–0.06 (78%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  3. Chara – Miller2:34

    xG 0.16–0.04 (79%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BOS 3.6 xGTOR 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BOSTOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #258 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.85 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50BOS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 68% of the time.

BOS winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (BOS − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).