Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 1, 2015·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Los Angeles Kings 3, Vancouver Canucks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 83% of the time.

VAN winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK016114210340
VAN181206216

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:18VANAlexandre BurrowsPPAssists: Daniel Sedin, Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.26 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:39VANRadim VrbataAssists: Chris Higgins, Henrik Sedin · Slap, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P2 14:39LAKDwight KingAssists: Mike Richards · Wrist, 0.33 xG1–2
  4. P3 17:53LAKJustin WilliamsPPAssists: Drew Doughty, Dustin Brown · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 18:46LAKJarret StollGWGAssists: Tanner Pearson, Matt Greene · Slap, 0.03 xG3–2
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 5:20VANBrad Richardson: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 10:58LAKDustin Brown: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:28VANRyan Stanton: Holding2 min
  4. P2 6:22VANAlexandre Burrows: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 16:02VANRyan Stanton: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← LAK attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sedin won the faceoff against Stoll
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKVAN
40Shots on goal16
3.6Expected goals1.5
67Shot attempts33
28Faceoffs won33
4Power plays1
2Penalty minutes8
25Hits18
10Blocked shots16
5Giveaways14
3Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestRichards – King – Clifford8:30

    xG 1.05–0.29 (79%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  2. Carter – Toffoli – Pearson9:34

    xG 0.76–0.07 (92%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. Stoll – Brown – Lewis8:47

    xG 0.63–0.03 (95%)attempts 11–1goals 0–0

  4. Gaborik – Williams – Kopitar11:21

    xG 0.74–0.53 (58%)attempts 17–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMuzzin – Doughty19:17

    xG 1.49–0.16 (90%)attempts 24–12goals 1–0

  2. Schultz – McBain11:37

    xG 0.71–0.34 (68%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  3. Greene – Martinez11:58

    xG 0.73–0.42 (63%)attempts 17–6goals 1–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. Higgins – Hansen – Bonino11:14

    xG 0.24–0.37 (39%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

  2. Higgins – Bonino – Vey2:03

    xG 0.03–0.19 (14%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Richardson – Matthias – Vey7:59

    xG 0.11–0.42 (20%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Sedin – Vrbata13:46

    xG 0.23–0.74 (24%)attempts 9–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Edler – Tanev14:31

    xG 0.39–0.72 (35%)attempts 10–15goals 1–0

  2. Weber – Sbisa12:30

    xG 0.17–0.74 (18%)attempts 5–14goals 0–0

  3. Bieksa – Stanton17:03

    xG 0.21–1.34 (13%)attempts 8–25goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 1.5 xGLAK 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #269 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.80 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 6% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +46 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 83% of the time.

VAN winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).