Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 6, 2015·American Airlines Center, Dallas

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Dallas Stars 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 62% of the time.

DAL winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ2611014420
DAL01025011226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:21CBJJames WisniewskiAssists: Scott Hartnell, Nick Foligno · Snap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:26CBJRyan JohansenPPAssists: Scott Hartnell, Nick Foligno · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P2 3:57CBJKevin ConnautonGWGAssists: Ryan Johansen, Nick Foligno · Slap, 0.03 xG3–0
  4. P2 5:28DALAles HemskyAssists: Jamie Oleksiak · Slap, 0.07 xG3–1
  5. P2 13:14DALAntoine RousselAssists: Ryan Garbutt · Tip-in, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 17:02CBJMark LetestuAssists: Alexander Wennberg, Sean Collins · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–2
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 0:55DALAntoine Roussel: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 6:12DALTravis Moen: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P1 10:16CBJDavid Savard: Interference2 min
  4. P1 13:20CBJScott Hartnell: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 17:04DALErik Cole: Interference2 min
  6. P2 7:15CBJJames Wisniewski: Interference2 min
  7. P2 10:30CBJFedor Tyutin: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 14:46CBJJared Boll: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 14:46DALTravis Moen: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 15:27DALCody Eakin: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 6:44CBJFedor Tyutin: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 10:50DALBrett Ritchie: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0DAL
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackDAL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eakin won the faceoff against Johansen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJDAL
20Shots on goal26
1.7Expected goals2.3
38Shot attempts53
26Faceoffs won33
5Power plays5
15Penalty minutes15
24Hits21
15Blocked shots6
9Giveaways12
10Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. Skille – Collins – Wennberg7:42

    xG 0.15–0.21 (41%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  2. Boll – Letestu – Morin3:10

    xG 0.06–0.13 (31%)attempts 2–2goals 0–1

  3. Hartnell – Foligno – Johansen10:45

    xG 0.37–0.59 (38%)attempts 7–15goals 2–0

  4. Dubinsky – Calvert – Atkinson8:36

    xG 0.07–0.35 (16%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Wisniewski – Connauton8:10

    xG 0.22–0.23 (50%)attempts 6–6goals 2–0

  2. Tyutin – Goloubef13:48

    xG 0.23–0.26 (47%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Savard11:44

    xG 0.52–0.70 (43%)attempts 10–14goals 0–1

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestBenn – Seguin – Ritchie6:54

    xG 0.50–0.01 (98%)attempts 14–1goals 0–0

  2. Benn – Sceviour – Seguin2:04

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Spezza – Hemsky7:39

    xG 0.37–0.35 (51%)attempts 9–6goals 1–1

  4. Roussel – Eakin – Garbutt9:05

    xG 0.32–0.33 (49%)attempts 8–7goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestDemers – Benn8:22

    xG 0.41–0.16 (72%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  2. Goligoski – Klingberg11:02

    xG 0.17–0.07 (70%)attempts 8–4goals 0–1

  3. Daley – Oleksiak9:01

    xG 0.45–0.43 (51%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

DAL 2.3 xGCBJ 1.7 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

DALCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

DAL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line DAL is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 64/100 · #390 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.31 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50DAL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Dallas Stars win this game 62% of the time.

DAL winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (DAL − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).