Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 8, 2015·Scottrade Center, St. Louis

San Jose Sharks 2, St. Louis Blues 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 71% of the time.

STL winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS1711306226
STL31221125728

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:38STLAlexander SteenPPAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Jaden Schwartz · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:06STLJay BouwmeesterAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Jori Lehtera · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:27SJSLogan CoutureSHAssists: Brenden Dillon · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:06STLPaul StastnyPPGWGAssists: T.J. Oshie, Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P2 0:29SJSMelker KarlssonAssists: Logan Couture, Brent Burns · Wrist, 0.35 xG2–3
  6. P2 8:52STLJori LehteraAssists: Jaden Schwartz · Slap, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P2 13:20STLT.J. OshieAssists: Alexander Steen, David Backes · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–5
  8. P3 9:05STLPatrik BerglundAssists: Paul Stastny · Wrap-around, 0.04 xG2–6
  9. P3 11:59STLDavid BackesAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Alex Pietrangelo · Snap, 0.09 xG2–7
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 9:29SJSJohn Scott: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:26SJSJoe Pavelski: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:15STLDmitrij Jaskin: High sticking2 min
  4. P3 13:22SJSJohn Scott: Interference2 min
  5. P3 19:15STLRyan Reaves: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 19:15STLRyan Reaves: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P3 19:15SJSJohn Scott: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P3 19:15STLRyan Reaves: Misconduct10 min
  9. P3 19:15SJSJohn Scott: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0STL
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackSTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Marleau won the faceoff against Stastny
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSSTL
26Shots on goal28
1.9Expected goals3.1
42Shot attempts55
33Faceoffs won30
2Power plays4
20Penalty minutes16
28Hits14
7Blocked shots6
3Giveaways4
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestSheppard – Nieto – Hertl6:07

    xG 0.38–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Pavelski – Couture – Karlsson9:38

    xG 0.51–0.30 (63%)attempts 5–11goals 1–1

  3. Marleau – Wingels – Nieto3:50

    xG 0.10–0.09 (53%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Sheppard – Goodrow – Hertl3:25

    xG 0.05–0.13 (29%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Burns – Vlasic15:10

    xG 0.67–0.87 (43%)attempts 12–14goals 1–2

  2. Braun – Dillon15:36

    xG 0.42–0.72 (37%)attempts 13–15goals 0–2

  3. Irwin – Tennyson16:16

    xG 0.22–0.52 (30%)attempts 9–11goals 0–0

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestLehtera – Tarasenko – Schwartz8:41

    xG 0.48–0.07 (88%)attempts 13–4goals 2–0

  2. Ott – Lapierre – Reaves9:03

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Steen – Backes – Oshie11:59

    xG 0.58–0.55 (52%)attempts 10–10goals 1–1

  4. Stastny – Berglund – Jaskin12:04

    xG 0.49–0.56 (47%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Pietrangelo14:42

    xG 1.03–0.50 (67%)attempts 22–9goals 4–1

  2. Shattenkirk – Gunnarsson16:03

    xG 0.79–0.31 (72%)attempts 16–11goals 0–0

  3. Jackman – Butler15:38

    xG 0.42–0.36 (54%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

STL 3.1 xGSJS 1.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

STLSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

STL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line STL is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #537 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50STL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 71% of the time.

STL winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (STL − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).