Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 10, 2015·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Nashville Predators 3, Minnesota Wild 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 59% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH1809210327
MIN11409014137

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:01NSHMike FisherAssists: Colin Wilson · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:14MINCharlie CoyleAssists: Christian Folin, Nino Niederreiter · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P3 3:48NSHCalle JarnkrokGWGAssists: Olli Jokinen, Shea Weber · Wrist, 0.00 xG2–1
  4. P3 8:47NSHColin WilsonUnassisted · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–1
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 8:48NSHAnton Volchenkov: Interference2 min
  2. P1 14:51NSHPaul Gaustad: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 14:51MINRyan Carter: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 0:48NSHCraig Smith: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 1:26MINZach Parise: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 6:46NSHCraig Smith: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 9:16NSHPekka Rinne: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 0:00MINChristian Folin: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 0:00NSHColin Wilson: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 11:57NSHFilip Forsberg: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  11. P3 17:55NSHShea Weber: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 17:55MINMatt Cooke: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 17:55MINMatt Cooke: High sticking2 min
  14. P3 18:28MINNate Prosser: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 18:28NSHMike Fisher: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← NSH attackMIN attack →
  1. Press play, or drag along the timeline.
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHMIN
27Shots on goal37
1.8Expected goals2.3
50Shot attempts64
29Faceoffs won34
2Power plays5
27Penalty minutes21
11Hits14
14Blocked shots13
3Giveaways10
5Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestGaustad – Stalberg – Bourque7:59

    xG 0.09–0.02 (79%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

  2. Ribeiro – Wilson – Smith4:47

    xG 0.15–0.10 (59%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  3. Ribeiro – Smith – Forsberg7:18

    xG 0.21–0.22 (49%)attempts 10–7goals 0–1

  4. Cullen – Jokinen – Jarnkrok8:45

    xG 0.63–0.64 (50%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkholm – Jones15:32

    xG 0.83–0.47 (64%)attempts 17–12goals 1–0

  2. Volchenkov – Bartley8:57

    xG 0.21–0.58 (27%)attempts 8–16goals 1–1

  3. Weber – Josi19:43

    xG 0.30–0.68 (30%)attempts 13–23goals 1–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Pominville – Zucker10:36

    xG 0.54–0.04 (93%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

  2. Schroeder – Coyle – Niederreiter7:01

    xG 0.45–0.09 (83%)attempts 12–3goals 1–1

  3. Cooke – Brodziak – Carter7:08

    xG 0.11–0.13 (47%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  4. Vanek – Parise – Haula12:28

    xG 0.35–0.76 (32%)attempts 15–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodin – Folin12:14

    xG 0.49–0.21 (70%)attempts 13–9goals 1–1

  2. Suter – Spurgeon18:23

    xG 0.89–0.66 (57%)attempts 23–14goals 0–0

  3. Spurgeon – Brodin3:23

    xG 0.23–0.13 (64%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.3 xGNSH 1.8 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 30/100 · #824 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.14 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 59% of the time.

MIN winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).