Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 12, 2015·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Philadelphia Flyers 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 58% of the time.

PHI winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL1516113324
PHI21051302725

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:12PHIChris VandeVeldeAssists: Luke Schenn, Claude Giroux · Tip-in, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:26TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Tyler Johnson, Anton Stralman · Snap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 16:15PHIR.J. UmbergerAssists: Matt Read, Braydon Coburn · Backhand, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:45PHIJakub VoracekPPAssists: Mark Streit, Claude Giroux · Slap, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 2:36PHIPierre-Edouard BellemareGWGAssists: Chris VandeVelde, Michael Del Zotto · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–4
  6. P2 7:02PHIMark StreitPPAssists: Brayden Schenn, Wayne Simmonds · Snap, 0.14 xG1–5
  7. P2 8:37PHIBrayden SchennPPAssists: Mark Streit, Jakub Voracek · Snap, 0.16 xG1–6
  8. P2 15:01PHIMichael RafflAssists: Scott Laughton, Wayne Simmonds · Wrist, 0.41 xG1–7
  9. P2 15:23TBLBrian BoyleAssists: Cedric Paquette, Anton Stralman · Deflected, 0.01 xG2–7
  10. P3 1:20TBLRyan CallahanPPAssists: Jonathan Drouin, Valtteri Filppula · Snap, 0.08 xG3–7
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 9:09PHIMichael Del Zotto: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 1:00TBLMatt Carle: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 6:49TBLMatt Carle: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  4. P2 7:54TBLTyler Johnson: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 19:41PHIMark Streit: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 14:03PHIAndrew MacDonald: Fighting5 min
  7. P3 14:03TBLBrenden Morrow: Fighting5 min
  8. P3 14:03PHIWayne Simmonds: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
46% to win54% to win
← TBL attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Laughton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLPHI
24Shots on goal25
2.5Expected goals2.9
50Shot attempts44
31Faceoffs won29
3Power plays4
13Penalty minutes11
22Hits34
13Blocked shots9
8Giveaways7
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Palat – Kucherov5:53

    xG 0.57–0.22 (73%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Filppula – Callahan – Killorn3:35

    xG 0.22–0.01 (96%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Connolly – Paquette – Drouin2:18

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–0goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Callahan – Paquette6:33

    xG 0.05–0.10 (32%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarle – Barberio9:18

    xG 0.51–0.18 (74%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  2. Garrison – Barberio3:27

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Carle – Sustr6:17

    xG 0.34–0.28 (55%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLecavalier – VandeVelde – Bellemare9:19

    xG 0.34–0.11 (76%)attempts 5–7goals 1–1

  2. Simmonds – Laughton – Raffl13:34

    xG 0.59–0.55 (52%)attempts 8–15goals 1–0

  3. Giroux – Voracek – Schenn11:53

    xG 0.41–0.52 (44%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  4. Umberger – Read – Couturier11:41

    xG 0.40–0.84 (32%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStreit – Del Zotto5:20

    xG 0.64–0.25 (72%)attempts 4–6goals 2–1

  2. Schultz – Coburn4:58

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 1–0

  3. Schenn – Del Zotto8:46

    xG 0.45–0.18 (71%)attempts 6–6goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.9 xGTBL 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHITBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #341 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.88 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 58% of the time.

PHI winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).