Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Jan 21, 2015·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Los Angeles Kings 2, San Jose Sharks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 87% of the time.

SJS winsLAK wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
LAK0616116228
SJS1101926425

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:44SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Matt Irwin, Antti Niemi · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:39LAKDustin BrownAssists: Marian Gaborik, Anze Kopitar · Wrap-around, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 16:39SJSPatrick MarleauPPAssists: Logan Couture, Joe Thornton · Tip-in, 0.16 xG1–2
  4. P3 8:27SJSJoe PavelskiPPGWGAssists: Patrick Marleau, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–3
  5. P3 19:37LAKJeff CarterPPAssists: Anze Kopitar, Nicholas Shore · Tip-in, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:57SJSLogan CoutureENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.64 xG2–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 6:11LAKJeff Carter: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 9:48SJSBrenden Dillon: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 9:48LAKKyle Clifford: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 16:05SJSJohn Scott: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 6:45SJSBrenden Dillon: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 15:40LAKDrew Doughty: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 5:45SJSJames Sheppard: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 6:41LAKDrew Doughty: High sticking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 15:18LAKTrevor Lewis: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 15:18SJSBrent Burns: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 16:38SJSBrenden Dillon: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 19:28SJSJoe Thornton: Boarding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

LAK00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← LAK attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thornton won the faceoff against Stoll
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

LAKSJS
28Shots on goal25
1.7Expected goals4.0
48Shot attempts55
35Faceoffs won28
5Power plays3
13Penalty minutes17
45Hits42
15Blocked shots10
12Giveaways14
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. Clifford – Nolan – Shore5:13

    xG 0.08–0.06 (56%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Gaborik – Brown – Kopitar9:49

    xG 0.16–0.24 (40%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0

  3. Williams – Stoll – Richards6:25

    xG 0.02–0.14 (15%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Williams – Stoll – Lewis2:05

    xG 0.03–0.19 (12%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Regehr – Greene3:09

    xG 0.02–0.02 (43%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  2. Regehr – Doughty2:26

    xG 0.09–0.10 (46%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  3. Regehr – Martinez10:38

    xG 0.13–0.29 (32%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestKennedy – Sheppard – Hertl11:01

    xG 0.43–0.06 (88%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Karlsson13:58

    xG 0.38–0.09 (81%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0

  3. Marleau – Couture – Nieto8:37

    xG 0.38–0.13 (74%)attempts 9–8goals 1–1

  4. Desjardins – Scott – Goodrow4:35

    xG 0.01–0.11 (9%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHannan – Irwin11:36

    xG 0.43–0.12 (78%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Vlasic15:25

    xG 0.52–0.25 (67%)attempts 13–14goals 1–1

  3. Dillon – Tennyson11:56

    xG 0.33–0.22 (60%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 4.0 xGLAK 1.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSLAK

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it LAK. Dots are goals.

Excitement 44/100 · #644 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.14 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
LAK 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 87% of the time.

SJS winsLAK wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − LAK), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).