Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 29, 2015·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Anaheim Ducks 3, San Jose Sharks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 80% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA1140925328
SJS1951707633

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:57ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Rickard Rakell, Jakob Silfverberg · Wrist, 0.43 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:23SJSJoe PavelskiPPAssists: Joe Thornton, Patrick Marleau · Tip-in, 0.20 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:15SJSBarclay GoodrowAssists: James Sheppard, Tomas Hertl · Snap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:16SJSPatrick MarleauAssists: Brent Burns, Joe Thornton · Tip-in, 0.06 xG1–3
  5. P2 12:37SJSMatt IrwinGWGAssists: Logan Couture · Snap, 0.07 xG1–4
  6. P2 14:30SJSJames SheppardAssists: Barclay Goodrow, Tomas Hertl · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–5
  7. P2 16:07SJSBrenden DillonSHAssists: Matt Nieto, Matt Tennyson · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–6
  8. P3 1:23ANAMatt BeleskeyAssists: Ryan Kesler, Kyle Palmieri · Tip-in, 0.30 xG2–6
  9. P3 18:50ANAPatrick MaroonAssists: Hampus Lindholm · Snap, 0.05 xG3–6
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 6:00ANAKyle Palmieri: High sticking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:36ANAFrancois Beauchemin: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 10:36SJSAndrew Desjardins: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 10:36SJSAndrew Desjardins: Kneeing2 min
  5. P1 13:23ANABen Lovejoy: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 3:55ANARyan Kesler: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 6:32ANASami Vatanen: Interference2 min
  8. P2 14:58SJSJohn Scott: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 8:58ANAPatrick Maroon: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thornton won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANASJS
28Shots on goal33
4.6Expected goals2.6
60Shot attempts64
22Faceoffs won28
2Power plays5
15Penalty minutes9
39Hits19
20Blocked shots21
12Giveaways16
9Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Maroon12:28

    xG 1.54–0.37 (81%)attempts 13–15goals 0–1

  2. Cogliano – Silfverberg – Rakell8:22

    xG 1.06–0.12 (90%)attempts 14–3goals 1–1

  3. Kesler – Beleskey – Palmieri11:15

    xG 0.89–0.31 (74%)attempts 15–9goals 1–1

  4. Thompson – Bourque – Smith-Pelly7:30

    xG 0.13–0.33 (29%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStoner – Vatanen12:12

    xG 1.45–0.18 (89%)attempts 17–6goals 0–1

  2. Beauchemin – Lindholm14:24

    xG 1.13–0.53 (68%)attempts 22–21goals 2–2

  3. Lovejoy – Fowler13:29

    xG 0.69–0.38 (64%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestDesjardins – Scott – McGinn7:33

    xG 0.40–0.14 (75%)attempts 11–11goals 0–0

  2. Marleau – Pavelski – Couture2:29

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – Pavelski – Karlsson8:27

    xG 0.12–0.63 (16%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

  4. Sheppard – Goodrow – Hertl8:08

    xG 0.24–1.01 (19%)attempts 6–11goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDillon – Tennyson14:54

    xG 0.57–0.32 (64%)attempts 20–13goals 0–0

  2. Hannan – Irwin10:00

    xG 0.29–1.51 (16%)attempts 8–19goals 2–3

  3. Burns – Vlasic15:03

    xG 0.32–1.61 (16%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.6 xGANA 4.6 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #336 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.99 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 80% of the time.

SJS winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).