Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 7, 2015·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Pittsburgh Penguins 0, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 53% of the time.

VAN winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT07010014031
VAN21021413527

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:13VANAlexandre BurrowsPPGWGAssists: Radim Vrbata, Alexander Edler · Deflected, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:46VANBo HorvatAssists: Derek Dorsett · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–2
  3. P2 15:02VANShawn MatthiasAssists: Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–3
  4. P2 17:21VANZack KassianAssists: Linden Vey · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–4
  5. P3 2:05VANDaniel SedinPPAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Henrik Sedin · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–5
Penalties (19)
  1. P1 4:19PITKris Letang: Holding2 min
  2. P1 6:29PITSidney Crosby: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:02VANZack Kassian: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 14:02PITRobert Bortuzzo: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 14:02PITDavid Perron: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 14:02VANDan Hamhuis: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 5:05VANDerek Dorsett: Closing hand on puck2 min
  8. P2 17:21PITKris Letang: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P2 19:26VANDerek Dorsett: Holding2 min
  10. P3 1:13PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min · PPG
  11. P3 4:40VANDerek Dorsett: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 4:40PITPatric Hornqvist: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 10:08PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  14. P3 10:08PITPatric Hornqvist: Roughing2 min
  15. P3 10:08VANAlexandre Burrows: Roughing2 min
  16. P3 10:59VANAdam Clendening: Tripping2 min
  17. P3 14:09VANYannick Weber: Interference2 min
  18. P3 18:13VANLuca Sbisa: Misconduct10 min
  19. P3 18:13PITCraig Adams: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Malkin won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITVAN
31Shots on goal27
2.3Expected goals2.4
62Shot attempts43
33Faceoffs won36
4Power plays5
31Penalty minutes29
31Hits15
8Blocked shots14
6Giveaways4
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestAdams – Lapierre – Sill5:55

    xG 0.31–0.18 (63%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Hornqvist – Sill2:20

    xG 0.08–0.03 (74%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Malkin – Hornqvist – Arcobello7:31

    xG 0.13–0.19 (40%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

  4. Kunitz – Crosby – Perron9:36

    xG 0.29–0.38 (43%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBortuzzo – Pouliot9:09

    xG 0.61–0.25 (71%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  2. Scuderi – Despres10:38

    xG 0.25–0.48 (34%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

  3. Martin – Letang14:57

    xG 0.42–0.68 (38%)attempts 15–15goals 0–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Burrows8:50

    xG 0.36–0.11 (76%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  2. Hansen – Dorsett – Horvat10:58

    xG 0.39–0.24 (62%)attempts 6–10goals 1–0

  3. Vrbata – Matthias – Bonino8:31

    xG 0.51–0.55 (48%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  4. Higgins – Kassian – Vey7:34

    xG 0.28–0.41 (41%)attempts 3–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Sbisa12:17

    xG 0.48–0.35 (58%)attempts 10–12goals 2–0

  2. Edler – Weber12:03

    xG 0.50–0.43 (54%)attempts 10–11goals 1–0

  3. Stanton – Clendening11:11

    xG 0.42–0.43 (50%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.4 xGPIT 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1178 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.56 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 53% of the time.

VAN winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).