Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 8, 2015·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Anaheim Ducks 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 59% of the time.

TBL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA04112212328
TBL3101914523

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:55TBLBrian BoyleAssists: Victor Hedman, Brett Connolly · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 13:42TBLValtteri FilppulaAssists: Steven Stamkos, Ryan Callahan · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–2
  3. P1 18:52TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Tyler Johnson, Valtteri Filppula · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:49ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Corey Perry, Matt Beleskey · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–3
  5. P2 14:27TBLBrian BoyleGWGAssists: Brett Connolly, Ondrej Palat · Wrist, 0.25 xG1–4
  6. P3 6:14TBLRyan CallahanAssists: Steven Stamkos, Valtteri Filppula · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–5
  7. P3 14:57ANASami VatanenPPAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Ilya Bryzgalov · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–5
  8. P3 17:26ANAEric BrewerAssists: Nate Thompson, Andrew Cogliano · Slap, 0.07 xG3–5
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 5:36ANARyan Kesler: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 6:51ANADevante Smith-Pelly: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 9:26TBLLuke Witkowski: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 9:26ANAPatrick Maroon: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 10:11TBLOndrej Palat: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 9:50ANARyan Kesler: Holding2 min
  7. P2 15:05TBLNikita Nesterov: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 17:41ANANate Thompson: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 7:44ANAPatrick Maroon: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 7:44TBLCedric Paquette: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 8:35ANAFrancois Beauchemin: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 9:21TBLNikita Kucherov: Interference2 min
  13. P3 13:27TBLValtteri Filppula: Elbowing2 min · PPG
  14. P3 14:57TBLMark Barberio: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnson won the faceoff against Kesler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANATBL
28Shots on goal23
2.1Expected goals2.6
66Shot attempts40
31Faceoffs won32
5Power plays5
17Penalty minutes17
14Hits25
9Blocked shots21
11Giveaways9
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestKesler – Maroon – Silfverberg3:51

    xG 0.33–0.08 (80%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Beleskey – Smith-Pelly – Rakell5:20

    xG 0.20–0.11 (66%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Beleskey – Palmieri – Rakell2:11

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  4. Getzlaf – Perry – Palmieri7:37

    xG 0.16–0.26 (38%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrewer – Fowler10:28

    xG 0.44–0.29 (60%)attempts 6–9goals 0–2

  2. Stoner – Vatanen11:42

    xG 0.38–0.39 (50%)attempts 12–6goals 1–1

  3. Beauchemin – Lindholm13:14

    xG 0.27–0.48 (36%)attempts 18–9goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyle – Connolly – Brown5:17

    xG 0.29–0.02 (95%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  2. Filppula – Callahan – Stamkos9:40

    xG 0.45–0.25 (64%)attempts 9–15goals 2–1

  3. Killorn – Paquette – Drouin6:51

    xG 0.04–0.18 (20%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  4. Johnson – Palat – Kucherov9:44

    xG 0.25–0.45 (35%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStralman – Nesterov8:29

    xG 1.01–0.29 (78%)attempts 10–7goals 3–0

  2. Hedman – Sustr12:27

    xG 0.61–0.42 (59%)attempts 13–19goals 2–0

  3. Barberio – Witkowski11:46

    xG 0.00–0.16 (0%)attempts 1–8goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.6 xGANA 2.1 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #344 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.72 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 59% of the time.

TBL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).