Mon, Feb 9, 2015·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose
Calgary Flames 4, San Jose Sharks 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 58% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGY | 18 | 110 | 29 | 427 |
| SJS | 07 | 113 | 014 | 134 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 14:52CGYMason RaymondAssists: Lance Bouma, Kris Russell · Snap, 0.09 xG1–0
- P2 8:10CGYLance BoumaGWGAssists: Mark Giordano, David Jones · Backhand, 0.16 xG2–0
- P2 19:59SJSBrent BurnsAssists: Logan Couture, Joe Pavelski · Slap, 0.04 xG2–1
- P3 5:20CGYJiri HudlerPPAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Dennis Wideman · Snap, 0.14 xG3–1
- P3 18:07CGYDavid JonesENAssists: TJ Brodie · Wrist, 0.55 xG4–1
Penalties (6)
- P1 4:00CGYMark Giordano: Tripping2 min
- P1 11:26SJSBrent Burns: Hooking2 min
- P2 9:39CGYDavid Wolf: Holding2 min
- P2 14:28SJSMatt Tennyson: Interference2 min
- P3 3:28SJSBrent Burns: Roughing2 min · PPG
- P3 14:24CGYMikael Backlund: Holding2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Tierney
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Calgary Flames
Forward lines
- bestJones – Backlund – Bouma7:40
xG 0.78–0.18 (81%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0
- Colborne – Jooris – Wolf5:24
xG 0.18–0.21 (46%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
- Hudler – Gaudreau – Monahan10:52
xG 0.05–0.26 (15%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0
- Stajan – Glencross – Raymond8:19
xG 0.08–0.34 (19%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGiordano – Brodie16:18
xG 1.26–0.57 (69%)attempts 20–18goals 1–1
- Engelland – Diaz10:14
xG 0.30–0.28 (52%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0
- Wideman – Russell13:11
xG 0.19–0.40 (33%)attempts 9–18goals 1–0
San Jose Sharks
Forward lines
- bestThornton – Pavelski – Karlsson10:25
xG 0.39–0.20 (66%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0
- Kennedy – Desjardins – Sheppard7:25
xG 0.38–0.27 (58%)attempts 7–7goals 0–1
- Wingels – Hertl – Tierney7:27
xG 0.29–0.37 (45%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1
- Marleau – Couture – Nieto11:08
xG 0.42–0.51 (45%)attempts 15–12goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHannan – Burns12:55
xG 0.52–0.30 (63%)attempts 17–11goals 0–0
- Hannan – Irwin2:04
xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0
- Irwin – Tennyson10:34
xG 0.27–0.44 (37%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 58% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (SJS − CGY), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).