Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 12, 2015·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Ottawa Senators 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 50% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT2111618041529
OTT06010416010433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:01PITKris LetangAssists: Beau Bennett, Brandon Sutter · Wrap-around, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:57PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Rob Scuderi · Slap, 0.06 xG2–0
  3. P2 13:52PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Blake Comeau, Kris Letang · Snap, 0.08 xG3–0
  4. P3 5:09OTTMika ZibanejadPPAssists: Bobby Ryan, Cody Ceci · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–1
  5. P3 9:04OTTMike HoffmanAssists: Bobby Ryan, Erik Karlsson · Wrist, 0.03 xG3–2
  6. P3 14:53PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Chris Kunitz · Wrist, 0.51 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:51OTTMark StoneAssists: Kyle Turris, Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.14 xG4–3
  8. P3 16:04OTTKyle TurrisAssists: Eric Gryba, Mark Borowiecki · Backhand, 0.09 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. OTT Bobby Ryan stopped
  2. 2. PIT David Perron scored
  3. 3. OTT Kyle Turris stopped
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  5. 5. OTT Mika Zibanejad stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P2 11:27PITKris Letang: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  2. P2 16:05OTTClarke MacArthur: Holding2 min
  3. P2 17:16PITSidney Crosby: Cross checking2 min
  4. P3 2:25PITCraig Adams: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 4:35PITKris Letang: Hooking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 15:21OTTChris Neil: Misconduct10 min
  7. P3 15:21PITChris Kunitz: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Turris won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITOTT
29Shots on goal33
2.6Expected goals2.6
51Shot attempts54
28Faceoffs won45
1Power plays3
16Penalty minutes12
29Hits32
11Blocked shots13
9Giveaways10
4Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Crosby – Perron13:16

    xG 0.92–0.04 (96%)attempts 13–5goals 2–0

  2. Sutter – Spaling – Bennett11:35

    xG 0.89–0.06 (94%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  3. Malkin – Comeau – Hornqvist13:07

    xG 0.41–0.42 (49%)attempts 15–12goals 1–1

  4. Adams – Lapierre – Sill8:38

    xG 0.04–0.43 (8%)attempts 2–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Letang20:26

    xG 1.80–0.56 (76%)attempts 20–15goals 3–1

  2. Bortuzzo – Pouliot11:12

    xG 0.25–0.35 (42%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Scuderi – Despres17:55

    xG 0.21–0.37 (36%)attempts 9–14goals 1–1

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestMacArthur – Chiasson – Lazar5:05

    xG 0.40–0.04 (91%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Michalek – Turris – Stone15:55

    xG 0.34–0.22 (61%)attempts 8–11goals 2–0

  3. MacArthur – Condra – Lazar5:39

    xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  4. Ryan – Chiasson – Zibanejad6:43

    xG 0.27–0.20 (57%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMethot – Karlsson23:32

    xG 0.96–0.18 (84%)attempts 23–8goals 2–1

  2. Gryba – Borowiecki10:48

    xG 0.16–0.27 (37%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

  3. Borowiecki – Ceci2:42

    xG 0.11–0.52 (17%)attempts 1–2goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.6 xGPIT 2.6 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #66 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.00 · 8 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 50% of the time.

OTT winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).