Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 12, 2015·Amalie Arena, Tampa

St. Louis Blues 6, Tampa Bay Lightning 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 76% of the time.

TBL winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL217317110644
TBL0621419329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:50STLT.J. OshieAssists: Alexander Steen · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:47STLDmitrij JaskinPPAssists: Alexander Steen · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–0
  3. P2 8:03TBLTyler JohnsonPPAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Anton Stralman · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:15STLAlexander SteenAssists: David Backes · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P2 14:11STLDavid BackesGWGAssists: T.J. Oshie, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–1
  6. P2 15:23STLPaul StastnyAssists: Patrik Berglund, Ian Cole · Wrist, 0.26 xG5–1
  7. P2 17:28TBLBrett ConnollyAssists: Valtteri Filppula · Wrist, 0.06 xG5–2
  8. P3 6:31TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Alex Killorn, Anton Stralman · Tip-in, 0.08 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:55STLVladimir TarasenkoENUnassisted · Backhand, 0.62 xG6–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 4:22TBLMark Barberio: Broken stick2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:41TBLOndrej Palat: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 11:08STLDmitrij Jaskin: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 12:20TBLBrett Connolly: Interference2 min
  5. P2 7:48STLDavid Backes: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P3 6:45STLDavid Backes: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Boyle won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLTBL
44Shots on goal29
3.6Expected goals2.0
58Shot attempts54
33Faceoffs won36
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
17Hits25
13Blocked shots9
7Giveaways16
7Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSteen – Backes – Oshie12:06

    xG 0.82–0.23 (78%)attempts 14–8goals 2–1

  2. Stastny – Berglund – Jaskin11:09

    xG 0.68–0.18 (79%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  3. Lehtera – Tarasenko – Schwartz10:18

    xG 0.32–0.30 (52%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

  4. Ott – Goc – Reaves8:39

    xG 0.06–0.60 (9%)attempts 3–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Gunnarsson15:48

    xG 0.71–0.23 (75%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

  2. Butler – Pietrangelo17:20

    xG 0.95–0.56 (63%)attempts 19–14goals 2–1

  3. Jackman – Cole11:33

    xG 0.18–0.56 (24%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestMorrow – Boyle – Namestnikov3:56

    xG 0.26–0.03 (91%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Callahan – Killorn – Stamkos6:17

    xG 0.20–0.04 (84%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  3. Morrow – Boyle – Drouin4:11

    xG 0.15–0.04 (79%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  4. Filppula – Connolly – Drouin3:40

    xG 0.06–0.15 (29%)attempts 1–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Stralman – Hedman2:00

    xG 0.05–0.02 (76%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Garrison – Sustr5:19

    xG 0.10–0.09 (51%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Witkowski – Hedman6:30

    xG 0.13–0.19 (41%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.0 xGSTL 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #250 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 76% of the time.

TBL winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).