Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 13, 2015·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Boston Bruins 2, Vancouver Canucks 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 62% of the time.

VAN winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS1100419223
VAN2711226525

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:41VANShawn MatthiasAssists: Zack Kassian, Derek Dorsett · Tip-in, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 5:03VANShawn MatthiasUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P1 9:38BOSPatrice BergeronUnassisted · Deflected, 0.29 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:26VANRadim VrbataGWGAssists: Chris Higgins, Linden Vey · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P3 5:41BOSChris KellyUnassisted · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 6:05VANShawn MatthiasAssists: Zack Kassian · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:00VANJannik HansenENAssists: Bo Horvat, Chris Tanev · Wrist, 0.48 xG2–5
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 7:21BOSPatrice Bergeron: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 12:30BOSGregory Campbell: High sticking double minor4 min
  3. P1 16:54VANDan Hamhuis: Boarding2 min
  4. P3 6:23VANDan Hamhuis: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 14:25VANAdam Clendening: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← BOS attackVAN attack →
  1. Press play, or drag along the timeline.
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSVAN
23Shots on goal25
2.8Expected goals2.2
60Shot attempts49
30Faceoffs won19
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
23Hits19
12Blocked shots18
8Giveaways9
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestKelly – Soderberg – Pastrnak3:59

    xG 0.34–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 1–0

  2. Eriksson – Bergeron – Marchand3:17

    xG 0.16–0.05 (77%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Krejci – Lucic – Pastrnak8:02

    xG 0.31–0.29 (51%)attempts 7–7goals 0–2

  4. Bergeron – Marchand – Smith6:44

    xG 0.09–0.08 (53%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamilton – Krug4:19

    xG 0.65–0.20 (77%)attempts 10–6goals 1–0

  2. Seidenberg – McQuaid11:53

    xG 0.78–0.38 (67%)attempts 12–8goals 0–2

  3. Miller – Krug9:21

    xG 0.47–0.28 (63%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestDorsett – Matthias – Kassian10:48

    xG 0.43–0.18 (70%)attempts 4–7goals 3–0

  2. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows10:30

    xG 0.24–0.34 (42%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  3. Hansen – Horvat – Kenins10:18

    xG 0.18–0.41 (30%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

  4. Vrbata – Higgins – Vey8:39

    xG 0.49–0.95 (34%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Hamhuis – Clendening2:09

    xG 0.03–0.03 (50%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  2. Hamhuis – Sbisa13:09

    xG 0.26–0.32 (45%)attempts 7–10goals 1–0

  3. Stanton – Clendening12:01

    xG 0.64–0.90 (42%)attempts 17–13goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.2 xGBOS 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #536 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 62% of the time.

VAN winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).