Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 15, 2015·Honda Center, Anaheim

Washington Capitals 5, Anaheim Ducks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH2122917528
ANA21411009333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:06ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Francois Beauchemin, Hampus Lindholm · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 1:22WSHAlex OvechkinAssists: Nicklas Backstrom · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 5:33ANACorey PerryAssists: Devante Smith-Pelly, Hampus Lindholm · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P1 10:26WSHAlex OvechkinPPAssists: Mike Green, Nicklas Backstrom · Slap, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P2 3:27WSHMarcus JohanssonAssists: Matt Niskanen, Brooks Orpik · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P2 9:04WSHAndre BurakovskyGWGAssists: Alex Ovechkin, Jack Hillen · Wrist, 0.13 xG4–2
  7. P2 12:13ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Ben Lovejoy · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–3
  8. P3 9:42WSHAndre BurakovskyAssists: Alex Ovechkin · Backhand, 0.08 xG5–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 7:54WSHMatt Niskanen: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 9:39ANAKyle Palmieri: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 13:09ANARyan Getzlaf: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 15:58WSHBrooks Laich: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 16:30ANARyan Getzlaf: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 17:57WSHAndre Burakovsky: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 0:46WSHBrooks Orpik: Holding2 min
  8. P3 3:37ANAAndrew Cogliano: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 19:29ANACam Fowler: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
46% to win54% to win
← WSH attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Fehr
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHANA
28Shots on goal33
2.4Expected goals3.2
55Shot attempts69
31Faceoffs won25
5Power plays4
8Penalty minutes10
35Hits20
18Blocked shots11
10Giveaways9
7Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestOvechkin – Backstrom – Burakovsky8:20

    xG 0.74–0.43 (63%)attempts 15–9goals 3–1

  2. Laich – Beagle – Latta8:21

    xG 0.24–0.14 (63%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  3. Ward – Fehr – Johansson11:20

    xG 0.30–0.39 (43%)attempts 10–8goals 1–0

  4. Chimera – Brouwer – Kuznetsov8:23

    xG 0.10–0.68 (13%)attempts 6–16goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Orpik – Green2:24

    xG 0.04–0.02 (68%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  2. Green – Hillen10:17

    xG 0.50–0.59 (46%)attempts 9–15goals 1–1

  3. Niskanen – Alzner13:58

    xG 0.46–0.56 (45%)attempts 16–12goals 1–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Smith-Pelly8:30

    xG 0.77–0.32 (71%)attempts 13–12goals 1–1

  2. Cogliano – Silfverberg – Rakell5:51

    xG 0.41–0.26 (61%)attempts 9–3goals 2–1

  3. Kesler – Beleskey – Palmieri3:07

    xG 0.01–0.01 (46%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Kesler – Maroon – Palmieri4:44

    xG 0.30–0.36 (46%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBeauchemin – Lindholm10:01

    xG 0.63–0.25 (71%)attempts 15–9goals 1–0

  2. Stoner – Lovejoy7:22

    xG 0.37–0.21 (63%)attempts 8–5goals 1–1

  3. Stoner – Vatanen2:34

    xG 0.17–0.12 (58%)attempts 3–5goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.2 xGWSH 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #248 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.83 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

ANA winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).