Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 20, 2015·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Anaheim Ducks 6, Calgary Flames 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA09116513638
CGY1111819328

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:50CGYMatt StajanAssists: Joe Colborne · Snap, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:02CGYLance BoumaAssists: Dennis Wideman · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P2 15:08ANAAndrew CoglianoAssists: Corey Perry, Josh Manson · Deflected, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P3 6:13ANAFrancois BeaucheminAssists: Andrew Cogliano, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 8:53ANARyan GetzlafAssists: Patrick Maroon, Hampus Lindholm · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 11:35ANAKyle PalmieriGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.30 xG4–2
  7. P3 14:45ANAJakob SilfverbergAssists: Patrick Maroon, Ryan Getzlaf · Snap, 0.19 xG5–2
  8. P3 18:10CGYSean MonahanPPAssists: Curtis Glencross, Johnny Gaudreau · Snap, 0.26 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:59ANAHampus LindholmENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.46 xG6–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 9:18ANACorey Perry: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 10:32ANAClayton Stoner: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 3:49ANAClayton Stoner: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 11:56CGYJohnny Gaudreau: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 0:57ANACorey Perry: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 17:23ANAPatrick Maroon: Slashing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← ANA attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Monahan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACGY
38Shots on goal28
3.4Expected goals2.7
64Shot attempts63
30Faceoffs won33
1Power plays5
10Penalty minutes2
14Hits22
24Blocked shots18
14Giveaways10
9Takeaways16

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Maroon – Palmieri10:01

    xG 0.83–0.19 (81%)attempts 17–7goals 2–0

  2. Kesler – Perry – Smith-Pelly8:05

    xG 0.50–0.09 (84%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Jackman – Thompson – Smith-Pelly3:37

    xG 0.15–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  4. Cogliano – Silfverberg – Rakell9:38

    xG 0.15–0.09 (61%)attempts 6–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBeauchemin – Lindholm16:49

    xG 1.36–0.47 (74%)attempts 19–15goals 4–1

  2. Stoner – Manson17:20

    xG 0.85–0.13 (87%)attempts 24–10goals 1–0

  3. Lovejoy – Fowler13:20

    xG 0.31–0.45 (40%)attempts 10–15goals 0–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestStajan – Colborne – Bollig6:42

    xG 0.20–0.10 (67%)attempts 4–10goals 1–0

  2. Jones – Backlund – Bouma12:41

    xG 0.40–0.74 (35%)attempts 13–14goals 0–1

  3. Glencross – Raymond – Granlund9:28

    xG 0.09–0.49 (15%)attempts 7–12goals 0–1

  4. Hudler – Gaudreau – Monahan11:04

    xG 0.07–0.89 (8%)attempts 9–11goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Engelland – Diaz11:23

    xG 0.26–0.50 (35%)attempts 7–14goals 1–2

  2. Giordano – Brodie15:49

    xG 0.25–0.63 (29%)attempts 16–15goals 0–0

  3. Wideman – Russell17:13

    xG 0.35–1.25 (22%)attempts 14–25goals 1–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.7 xGANA 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #186 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.51 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 61% of the time.

CGY winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).