Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 22, 2015·United Center, Chicago

Boston Bruins 6, Chicago Blackhawks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 57% of the time.

CHI winsBOS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BOS2841606630
CHI1120719228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:00BOSPatrice BergeronAssists: Reilly Smith, Brad Marchand · Wrist, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:03BOSLoui ErikssonPPAssists: Torey Krug, Dougie Hamilton · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:58CHIJonathan ToewsPPAssists: Patrick Kane, Duncan Keith · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:18BOSMilan LucicGWGAssists: David Pastrnak, Ryan Spooner · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P2 12:19BOSGregory CampbellAssists: Brian Ferlin, Dennis Seidenberg · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–1
  6. P2 17:27BOSDougie HamiltonPPAssists: Patrice Bergeron · Wrist, 0.03 xG5–1
  7. P2 19:56BOSReilly SmithAssists: Patrice Bergeron · Wrist, 0.04 xG6–1
  8. P3 14:18CHIBryan BickellAssists: David Rundblad, Duncan Keith · Tip-in, 0.12 xG6–2
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 7:31BOSBrad Marchand: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 7:31CHIMichal Rozsival: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 12:10CHIMarian Hossa: Holding2 min · PPG
  4. P1 15:05CHIPatrick Kane: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 17:29BOSBrad Marchand: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 19:52BOSTuukka Rask: Delaying game illegal play by goalie2 min · PPG
  7. P1 19:58BOSTuukka Rask: Slashing2 min
  8. P2 1:58CHIAndrew Shaw: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P2 3:56BOSBrian Ferlin: Too many men on the ice2 min
  10. P2 8:56CHIDaniel Carcillo: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 8:56BOSAdam McQuaid: Fighting5 min
  12. P2 17:24CHIRyan Hartman: Hooking2 min · PPG
  13. P2 17:24BOSJordan Caron: Slashing2 min
  14. P2 17:24CHIDaniel Carcillo: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BOS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
46% to win54% to win
← BOS attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BOSCHI
30Shots on goal28
2.7Expected goals2.3
52Shot attempts53
36Faceoffs won25
4Power plays4
17Penalty minutes17
39Hits24
18Blocked shots11
10Giveaways9
8Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Boston Bruins

Forward lines

  1. bestLucic – Spooner – Pastrnak8:47

    xG 0.53–0.30 (64%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

  2. Bergeron – Marchand – Smith8:10

    xG 0.49–0.31 (61%)attempts 12–6goals 2–0

  3. Campbell – Caron – Ferlin5:20

    xG 0.16–0.10 (61%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  4. Kelly – Eriksson – Soderberg12:37

    xG 0.38–0.49 (43%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChara – Hamilton12:13

    xG 0.46–0.17 (73%)attempts 12–7goals 2–0

  2. McQuaid – Krug7:43

    xG 0.42–0.18 (70%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  3. Chara – Seidenberg2:33

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Versteeg – Toews3:05

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Versteeg – Kane – Kruger2:40

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Carcillo – Kruger – Hartman4:06

    xG 0.31–0.19 (62%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  4. Hossa – Bickell – Toews5:19

    xG 0.31–0.24 (56%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Rundblad5:16

    xG 0.41–0.23 (64%)attempts 8–4goals 1–0

  2. Keith – Seabrook5:53

    xG 0.23–0.07 (76%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Rozsival – Keith6:20

    xG 0.30–0.20 (60%)attempts 7–5goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.3 xGBOS 2.7 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIBOS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #649 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.06 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
BOS 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 57% of the time.

CHI winsBOS wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − BOS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).