Tue, Feb 24, 2015·TD Garden, Boston
Vancouver Canucks 2, Boston Bruins 1
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 92% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAN | 110 | 010 | 18 | 228 |
| BOS | 18 | 020 | 013 | 141 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 1:05BOSDaniel PailleAssists: Loui Eriksson, Carl Soderberg · Backhand, 0.21 xG0–1
- P1 3:28VANRyan StantonAssists: Jannik Hansen, Ronalds Kenins · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
- P3 6:47VANZack KassianGWGAssists: Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin · Slap, 0.08 xG2–1
Penalties (8)
- P2 3:01VANDan Hamhuis: Hooking2 min
- P2 7:24VANDaniel Sedin: Hooking2 min
- P2 9:07BOSMilan Lucic: Hooking2 min
- P2 18:23VANEddie Lack: Tripping2 min
- P3 10:22VANShawn Matthias: Tripping2 min
- P3 0:00BOSBrad Marchand: Roughing2 min
- P3 0:00BOSBrad Marchand: Roughing2 min
- P3 0:00VANDerek Dorsett: Roughing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Sedin
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- Hansen – Horvat – Kenins10:10
xG 0.46–0.47 (49%)attempts 9–13goals 0–0
- Sedin – Sedin – Kassian9:34
xG 0.24–0.45 (35%)attempts 6–4goals 1–0
- Higgins – Dorsett – Vey7:59
xG 0.19–0.48 (28%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0
- Vrbata – Matthias – Bonino8:49
xG 0.34–0.72 (32%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- Hamhuis – Sbisa2:04
xG 0.08–0.12 (41%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0
- Stanton – Clendening13:23
xG 0.68–0.88 (43%)attempts 12–17goals 1–0
- Hamhuis – Weber14:11
xG 0.26–0.77 (25%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestBergeron – Marchand – Smith11:45
xG 0.77–0.21 (78%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1
- Paille – Eriksson – Soderberg11:42
xG 0.92–0.39 (70%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0
- Kelly – Caron – Ferlin4:58
xG 0.31–0.19 (62%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0
- Lucic – Spooner – Pastrnak9:32
xG 0.32–0.36 (47%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestChara – Hamilton12:50
xG 0.90–0.21 (81%)attempts 13–5goals 0–1
- McQuaid – Krug12:26
xG 0.75–0.49 (61%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0
- Seidenberg – Bartkowski15:20
xG 0.84–0.62 (58%)attempts 14–15goals 1–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
BOS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BOS is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Boston Bruins win this game 92% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (BOS − VAN), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).