Fri, Feb 27, 2015·Prudential Center, Newark
Boston Bruins 3, New Jersey Devils 2 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 52% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS | 112 | 09 | 19 | 14 | 334 |
| NJD | 04 | 012 | 213 | 02 | 231 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 8:39BOSDaniel PailleAssists: Loui Eriksson · Slap, 0.07 xG1–0
- P3 1:40BOSDavid PastrnakAssists: Chris Kelly, Reilly Smith · Wrist, 0.10 xG2–0
- P3 5:57NJDTravis ZajacPPAssists: Adam Henrique, Jacob Josefson · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–1
- P3 8:06NJDJordin TootooAssists: Michael Cammalleri, Adam Larsson · Snap, 0.11 xG2–2
- OT 2:46BOSRyan SpoonerGWGAssists: David Pastrnak, Torey Krug · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–2
Penalties (4)
- P1 14:15NJDJordin Tootoo: Delaying game2 min
- P2 13:31BOSDougie Hamilton: Tripping2 min
- P2 19:34NJDMark Fraser: Tripping2 min
- P3 5:06BOSChris Kelly: Hooking2 min · PPG
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Bergeron won the faceoff against Elias
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Boston Bruins
Forward lines
- bestLucic – Spooner – Pastrnak12:32
xG 0.91–0.62 (59%)attempts 15–11goals 0–0
- Bergeron – Marchand – Smith13:30
xG 0.34–0.27 (56%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0
- Paille – Eriksson – Soderberg12:52
xG 0.23–0.23 (50%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0
- Kelly – Caron – Ferlin10:21
xG 0.29–0.64 (31%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestChara – Hamilton17:17
xG 0.67–0.37 (65%)attempts 21–10goals 0–1
- McQuaid – Krug13:36
xG 0.94–0.90 (51%)attempts 16–10goals 1–0
- Seidenberg – Bartkowski18:26
xG 0.39–0.78 (33%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0
New Jersey Devils
Forward lines
- bestCammalleri – Tootoo – Zajac10:43
xG 0.61–0.20 (75%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0
- Elias – Zubrus – Bernier2:58
xG 0.31–0.01 (96%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0
- Gomez – Havlat – Cammalleri2:39
xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0
- Gomez – Havlat – Ruutu2:36
xG 0.12–0.21 (37%)attempts 1–2goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestZidlicky – Greene3:31
xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
- Merrill – Larsson2:47
xG 0.18–0.08 (70%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0
- Fraser – Gelinas10:29
xG 0.45–0.37 (55%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it BOS. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 52% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NJD − BOS), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).