Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 28, 2015·Pepsi Center, Denver

Minnesota Wild 3, Colorado Avalanche 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 66% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN18111113332
COL08110016134

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:49MINErik HaulaAssists: Justin Fontaine, Kyle Brodziak · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:32COLMax TalbotAssists: Nick Holden · Tip-in, 0.00 xG1–1
  3. P2 9:09MINJustin FontaineGWGAssists: Erik Haula, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P3 5:50MINJason PominvilleAssists: Mikael Granlund · Slap, 0.05 xG3–1
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 5:24MINMarco Scandella: Slashing2 min
  2. P2 3:15MINSean Bergenheim: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 6:58COLBrad Stuart: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 10:41MINMikko Koivu: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 11:27COLNathan MacKinnon: Interference2 min
  6. P2 12:06MINJordan Schroeder: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P2 12:59MINJustin Fontaine: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 17:13COLZach Redmond: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 4:50MINKyle Brodziak: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 4:50COLNate Guenin: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 6:33COLTyson Barrie: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 10:31MINChristian Folin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  13. P3 16:43MINNate Prosser: High sticking2 min
  14. P3 19:56MINCharlie Coyle: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 19:56COLCody McLeod: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 19:56COLCody McLeod: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  17. P3 19:56COLCody McLeod: Misconduct10 min
  18. P3 19:56COLGabriel Landeskog: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Duchene
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINCOL
32Shots on goal34
2.6Expected goals3.5
63Shot attempts67
26Faceoffs won37
4Power plays7
24Penalty minutes40
12Hits22
17Blocked shots18
0Giveaways2
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Bergenheim – Vanek8:35

    xG 0.43–0.12 (79%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  2. Pominville – Parise – Granlund10:14

    xG 0.64–0.37 (64%)attempts 15–11goals 1–1

  3. Schroeder – Coyle – Niederreiter9:04

    xG 0.29–0.18 (62%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  4. Brodziak – Haula – Fontaine5:03

    xG 0.15–0.13 (54%)attempts 7–4goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Dumba5:32

    xG 0.60–0.23 (73%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Brodin – Folin2:18

    xG 0.35–0.10 (78%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Brodin – Dumba3:42

    xG 0.16–0.10 (61%)attempts 6–4goals 2–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestTanguay – Mitchell – MacKinnon3:33

    xG 0.22–0.08 (73%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  2. O'Reilly – Landeskog – Everberg2:08

    xG 0.16–0.03 (86%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  3. Tanguay – Mitchell – Everberg4:55

    xG 0.06–0.14 (29%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1

  4. Cliche – Carey – MacKinnon5:01

    xG 0.10–0.20 (34%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Stuart – Hejda2:49

    xG 0.02–0.01 (64%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  2. Holden – Redmond2:26

    xG 0.05–0.05 (49%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Hejda – Redmond8:06

    xG 0.29–0.38 (43%)attempts 10–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.5 xGMIN 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 34/100 · #776 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.19 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 66% of the time.

COL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).