Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 1, 2015·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CBJ1100629325
PIT111316114541

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:33CBJJames WisniewskiPPAssists: Ryan Johansen, Jack Johnson · Slap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:55PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Chris Kunitz, Paul Martin · Backhand, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 2:34PITDavid PerronPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Kris Letang · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:20PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: Kris Letang, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P2 17:07PITDerrick PouliotPPGWGAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–4
  6. P3 0:18PITSteve DownieAssists: Daniel Winnik, Brandon Sutter · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–5
  7. P3 5:37CBJRyan JohansenSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–5
  8. P3 19:06CBJNick FolignoAssists: Scott Hartnell · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–5
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 16:43PITSimon Despres: Boarding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 16:43CBJNick Foligno: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 17:02PITPaul Martin: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 1:19CBJJames Wisniewski: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P2 2:26CBJFedor Tyutin: High sticking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 4:48PITSimon Despres: Holding2 min
  7. P2 9:04CBJAlexander Wennberg: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  8. P2 16:50CBJJared Boll: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  9. P3 0:52PITChris Kunitz: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 5:28CBJJack Johnson: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 11:31CBJCorey Tropp: Game misconduct10 min
  12. P3 11:31CBJCorey Tropp: Boarding5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← CBJ attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansen won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJPIT
25Shots on goal41
1.9Expected goals3.4
44Shot attempts65
35Faceoffs won38
3Power plays6
27Penalty minutes8
26Hits23
17Blocked shots13
2Giveaways10
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. Boll – Letestu – Tropp4:53

    xG 0.03–0.14 (16%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  2. Hartnell – Clarkson – Anisimov7:01

    xG 0.00–0.20 (2%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  3. Gibbons – Dano – Wennberg5:43

    xG 0.10–0.30 (25%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Atkinson – Johansen8:50

    xG 0.27–0.53 (34%)attempts 6–10goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Goloubef – Prout10:18

    xG 0.22–0.31 (41%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Savard16:26

    xG 0.60–0.79 (43%)attempts 13–24goals 0–1

  3. Tyutin – Wisniewski11:34

    xG 0.41–0.82 (33%)attempts 7–12goals 1–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestCrosby – Hornqvist – Perron9:36

    xG 0.95–0.25 (79%)attempts 13–7goals 0–1

  2. Lapierre – Spaling – Bennett8:08

    xG 0.33–0.10 (77%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Winnik – Downie – Sutter6:44

    xG 0.08–0.02 (84%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  4. Kunitz – Malkin – Comeau7:58

    xG 0.28–0.61 (32%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Letang12:04

    xG 0.82–0.14 (86%)attempts 15–7goals 2–0

  2. Scuderi – Despres11:42

    xG 0.59–0.13 (82%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. Bortuzzo – Pouliot9:48

    xG 0.36–0.05 (87%)attempts 12–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.4 xGCBJ 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #339 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.97 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 34% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).