Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 1, 2015·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

St. Louis Blues 5, Vancouver Canucks 6 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 67% of the time.

VAN winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
STL21209317011539
VAN21021119013631

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:02STLRyan ReavesAssists: Steve Ott, Marcel Goc · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:59STLAlex PietrangeloAssists: T.J. Oshie, David Backes · Wrap-around, 0.02 xG2–0
  3. P1 7:24VANShawn MatthiasAssists: Chris Higgins, Linden Vey · Deflected, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P1 9:40VANYannick WeberAssists: Radim Vrbata, Derek Dorsett · Slap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P2 10:15VANJannik HansenAssists: Ronalds Kenins, Ryan Stanton · Backhand, 0.06 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:52VANHenrik SedinAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Ronalds Kenins · Wrist, 0.46 xG2–4
  7. P3 6:07VANNick BoninoAssists: Yannick Weber, Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–5
  8. P3 8:18STLDmitrij JaskinPPAssists: Paul Stastny, T.J. Oshie · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–5
  9. P3 14:19STLPetteri LindbohmAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Vladimir Tarasenko · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–5
  10. P3 15:31STLDavid BackesAssists: T.J. Oshie · Wrist, 0.19 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. VAN Nick Bonino scored
  2. 2. STL T.J. Oshie stopped
  3. 3. VAN Radim Vrbata scored
  4. 4. STL Vladimir Tarasenko scored
  5. 5. VAN Chris Higgins scored
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 15:31STLPaul Stastny: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 19:35STLAlex Pietrangelo: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 19:35VANDan Hamhuis: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 3:06STLSteve Ott: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 3:06STLRyan Reaves: Misconduct10 min
  6. P2 3:06VANZack Kassian: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 3:06VANZack Kassian: Misconduct10 min
  8. P2 3:06STLRyan Reaves: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 12:33VANLinden Vey: High sticking2 min
  10. P2 19:04VANYannick Weber: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 7:26VANAdam Clendening: Hooking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 11:01VANDan Hamhuis: Holding2 min
  13. P3 11:36STLJori Lehtera: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bonino won the faceoff against Steen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLVAN
39Shots on goal31
2.8Expected goals1.8
63Shot attempts49
37Faceoffs won27
4Power plays3
20Penalty minutes22
34Hits41
13Blocked shots17
3Giveaways5
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestStastny – Berglund – Jaskin12:00

    xG 0.51–0.26 (67%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Ott – Goc – Reaves2:55

    xG 0.17–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  3. Lehtera – Tarasenko – Schwartz7:44

    xG 0.30–0.24 (55%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

  4. Steen – Backes – Oshie9:31

    xG 0.29–0.31 (49%)attempts 6–8goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJackman – Cole10:36

    xG 0.46–0.16 (75%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1

  2. Bouwmeester – Lindbohm15:03

    xG 0.61–0.46 (57%)attempts 15–15goals 2–2

  3. Gunnarsson – Pietrangelo15:07

    xG 0.39–0.85 (31%)attempts 9–15goals 2–2

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestHansen – Horvat – Kenins9:31

    xG 0.44–0.21 (68%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Vrbata – Dorsett – Bonino8:14

    xG 0.24–0.26 (48%)attempts 10–8goals 2–2

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Kassian9:14

    xG 0.10–0.18 (37%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  4. Higgins – Matthias – Vey6:24

    xG 0.32–0.74 (30%)attempts 7–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamhuis – Weber15:07

    xG 0.83–0.40 (68%)attempts 18–14goals 3–0

  2. Biega – Sbisa12:59

    xG 0.28–0.52 (35%)attempts 10–13goals 0–1

  3. Stanton – Clendening12:40

    xG 0.31–0.63 (33%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 1.8 xGSTL 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #11 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.35 · 10 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 67% of the time.

VAN winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).