Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 3, 2015·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Ottawa Senators 2, Minnesota Wild 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
OTT01027011052233
MIN012213011023338

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 0:52MINMathew DumbaAssists: Mikael Granlund · Slap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P2 8:05MINMathew DumbaAssists: Chris Stewart, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–2
  3. P2 8:33OTTMika ZibanejadAssists: Bobby Ryan, Patrick Wiercioch · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P2 11:48OTTBobby RyanAssists: Mike Hoffman, Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.08 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Mikko Koivu scored
  2. 2. OTT Bobby Ryan scored
  3. 3. MIN Zach Parise stopped
  4. 4. OTT Mika Zibanejad stopped
  5. 5. MIN Jason Pominville scored
  6. 6. OTT Kyle Turris scored
  7. 7. MIN Nino Niederreiter stopped
  8. 8. OTT Mark Stone stopped
  9. 9. MIN Charlie Coyle scored
  10. 10. OTT Mike Hoffman stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 17:55MINNino Niederreiter: Holding2 min
  2. P2 6:01OTTMatt Puempel: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 9:18OTTMilan Michalek: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 12:57OTTMilan Michalek: Holding the stick2 min
  5. P2 16:37MINMikael Granlund: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 3:46MINRyan Suter: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 10:48MINMathew Dumba: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← OTT attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Turris won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTMIN
33Shots on goal38
2.4Expected goals2.4
63Shot attempts58
29Faceoffs won32
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
14Hits16
11Blocked shots17
5Giveaways3
6Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestRyan – Hoffman – Zibanejad10:53

    xG 0.41–0.25 (62%)attempts 10–8goals 2–0

  2. Legwand – Chiasson – Puempel6:04

    xG 0.14–0.08 (63%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Condra – Pageau – Lazar8:36

    xG 0.10–0.06 (63%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  4. Michalek – Turris – Stone11:58

    xG 0.20–0.42 (33%)attempts 7–18goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Gryba – Borowiecki10:26

    xG 0.23–0.20 (54%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

  2. Wiercioch – Ceci9:54

    xG 0.33–0.32 (51%)attempts 10–14goals 1–0

  3. Methot – Karlsson18:24

    xG 0.38–0.41 (48%)attempts 16–11goals 0–2

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Bergenheim – Stewart4:13

    xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–1goals 0–0

  2. Koivu – Vanek – Stewart7:10

    xG 0.06–0.02 (72%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Parise – Granlund10:13

    xG 0.38–0.39 (49%)attempts 14–10goals 1–0

  4. Bergenheim – Coyle – Niederreiter7:28

    xG 0.13–0.18 (42%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Dumba5:45

    xG 0.41–0.08 (84%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  2. Brodin – Dumba4:17

    xG 0.20–0.08 (72%)attempts 4–5goals 1–0

  3. Suter – Brodin11:11

    xG 0.13–0.09 (59%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.4 xGOTT 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #334 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.65 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 51% of the time.

MIN winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).