Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 3, 2015·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

San Jose Sharks 6, Vancouver Canucks 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS3711825630
VAN01021107228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:03SJSChris TierneyAssists: Barclay Goodrow · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 7:18SJSMelker KarlssonAssists: Joe Pavelski, Matt Irwin · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–0
  3. P1 7:45SJSLogan CoutureGWGAssists: Matt Nieto, Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.17 xG3–0
  4. P2 1:01VANHenrik SedinPPAssists: Daniel Sedin, Radim Vrbata · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P2 9:12VANHenrik SedinAssists: Daniel Sedin, Chris Higgins · Backhand, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P2 11:45SJSMatt NietoAssists: Patrick Marleau · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P3 17:11SJSMatt NietoENAssists: Joe Thornton, Brent Burns · Snap, 0.56 xG5–2
  8. P3 18:09SJSMarc-Edouard VlasicENAssists: Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.45 xG6–2
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 12:53SJSJohn Scott: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 12:53VANDerek Dorsett: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 14:41SJSJoe Thornton: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 19:31SJSMatt Irwin: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  5. P2 6:24VANChris Higgins: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 12:20SJSBarclay Goodrow: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 12:54SJSPatrick Marleau: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 8:59SJSJoe Thornton: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
46% to win54% to win
← SJS attackVAN attack →
  1. Press play, or drag along the timeline.
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSVAN
30Shots on goal28
3.2Expected goals2.6
46Shot attempts59
19Faceoffs won36
1Power plays5
15Penalty minutes7
12Hits22
15Blocked shots10
4Giveaways4
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestScott – Goodrow – Tierney6:47

    xG 0.37–0.10 (78%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

  2. Thornton – Pavelski – Karlsson10:24

    xG 0.57–0.44 (57%)attempts 13–10goals 1–0

  3. Marleau – Couture – Nieto11:56

    xG 0.57–0.47 (55%)attempts 9–15goals 2–1

  4. Smith – Wingels – Hertl10:09

    xG 0.03–0.28 (8%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVlasic – Braun15:47

    xG 0.85–0.65 (57%)attempts 15–16goals 2–0

  2. Burns – Irwin14:32

    xG 0.53–0.44 (55%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  3. Dillon – Mueller14:41

    xG 0.21–0.19 (53%)attempts 5–14goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestHansen – Horvat – Kenins9:04

    xG 0.33–0.13 (71%)attempts 10–5goals 0–0

  2. Matthias – Bonino – McMillan7:57

    xG 0.19–0.21 (47%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  3. Higgins – Dorsett – Vey7:52

    xG 0.24–0.29 (45%)attempts 11–7goals 0–1

  4. Sedin – Sedin – Vrbata9:23

    xG 0.25–0.88 (22%)attempts 8–8goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestStanton – Clendening11:29

    xG 0.55–0.11 (83%)attempts 18–7goals 1–0

  2. Sbisa – Corrado14:05

    xG 0.77–0.56 (58%)attempts 15–12goals 0–2

  3. Hamhuis – Clendening2:08

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.6 xGSJS 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #331 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 59% of the time.

VAN winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).