Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 5, 2015·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Dallas Stars 4, Florida Panthers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
DAL21201018021432
FLA1721202030324

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:33DALCurtis McKenzieAssists: Jason Demers, Shawn Horcoff · Tip-in, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:41DALShawn HorcoffUnassisted · Slap, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:00FLABrandon PirriAssists: Vincent Trocheck · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:15FLADmitry KulikovAssists: Jussi Jokinen · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. P2 12:28FLAJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Nick Bjugstad, Dmitry Kulikov · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–3
  6. P3 12:21DALAlex GoligoskiAssists: John Klingberg · Snap, 0.02 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. FLA Brandon Pirri stopped
  2. 2. DAL Jason Spezza stopped
  3. 3. FLA Vincent Trocheck stopped
  4. 4. DAL John Klingberg stopped
  5. 5. FLA Nick Bjugstad stopped
  6. 6. DAL Colton Sceviour scored
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 12:24DALCurtis McKenzie: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 12:24FLADmitry Kulikov: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 19:25FLAScottie Upshall: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 6:07FLADmitry Kulikov: Holding2 min
  5. P2 16:28DALPatrik Nemeth: Holding2 min
  6. P3 5:36DALAlex Goligoski: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
46% to win54% to win
← DAL attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eakin won the faceoff against Trocheck
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALFLA
32Shots on goal24
2.5Expected goals2.7
65Shot attempts38
41Faceoffs won29
2Power plays2
9Penalty minutes9
41Hits36
7Blocked shots20
5Giveaways5
6Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestSpezza – Eaves – Benn8:42

    xG 0.36–0.00 (100%)attempts 10–0goals 0–0

  2. Roussel – Eakin – Garbutt7:39

    xG 0.37–0.21 (64%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  3. Eaves – Benn – Eakin4:16

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Horcoff – McKenzie – Ritchie8:21

    xG 0.15–0.14 (53%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Demers – Benn16:50

    xG 0.35–0.32 (52%)attempts 13–8goals 1–1

  2. Nemeth – Jokipakka11:25

    xG 0.24–0.24 (50%)attempts 9–5goals 0–1

  3. Goligoski – Klingberg19:51

    xG 1.13–1.40 (45%)attempts 28–10goals 2–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyes – Jokinen – Bjugstad10:25

    xG 0.69–0.34 (67%)attempts 7–12goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – MacKenzie – Kopecky8:36

    xG 0.74–0.45 (62%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

  3. Upshall – Huberdeau – Barkov10:20

    xG 0.14–0.28 (33%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

  4. Hayes – Pirri – Trocheck12:05

    xG 0.13–0.48 (21%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestO'Brien – Petrovic13:47

    xG 1.41–0.27 (84%)attempts 12–10goals 0–1

  2. Campbell – Kampfer2:19

    xG 0.14–0.11 (56%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Campbell – Petrovic2:00

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.7 xGDAL 2.5 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLADAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #172 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.11 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 54% of the time.

FLA winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).