Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 9, 2015·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Pittsburgh Penguins 1, San Jose Sharks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 81% of the time.

SJS winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT01509113031140
SJS1601508012230

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:03SJSMatt NietoAssists: Chris Tierney, Ben Smith · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P3 7:22PITSidney CrosbyAssists: David Perron, Kris Letang · Backhand, 0.07 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. SJS Joe Pavelski stopped
  2. 2. PIT David Perron stopped
  3. 3. SJS Logan Couture stopped
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  5. 5. SJS Melker Karlsson scored
  6. 6. PIT Kris Letang scored
  7. 7. SJS Patrick Marleau stopped
  8. 8. PIT Evgeni Malkin stopped
  9. 9. SJS Brent Burns stopped
  10. 10. PIT Chris Kunitz stopped
  11. 11. SJS Joe Thornton stopped
  12. 12. PIT Brandon Sutter stopped
  13. 13. SJS Tomas Hertl stopped
  14. 14. PIT Beau Bennett stopped
  15. 15. SJS Tommy Wingels scored
  16. 16. PIT Steve Downie stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 7:27PITSteve Downie: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 17:00PITRob Scuderi: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 3:29SJSJoe Thornton: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 12:07SJSJoe Pavelski: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 14:57PITDavid Perron: Holding2 min
  6. P2 14:57SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Holding2 min
  7. P3 10:47PITSteve Downie: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P3 13:13PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 13:13SJSTomas Hertl: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 19:33SJSTommy Wingels: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Sutter won the faceoff against Hertl
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITSJS
40Shots on goal30
4.2Expected goals2.0
93Shot attempts59
31Faceoffs won26
3Power plays3
10Penalty minutes10
20Hits29
17Blocked shots27
17Giveaways22
10Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Malkin – Comeau12:14

    xG 1.24–0.29 (81%)attempts 24–9goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Hornqvist – Perron10:48

    xG 0.67–0.41 (62%)attempts 13–11goals 1–0

  3. Lapierre – Winnik – Bennett4:22

    xG 0.34–0.12 (73%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  4. Downie – Sutter – Spaling4:36

    xG 0.21–0.25 (46%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLovejoy – Pouliot13:03

    xG 1.78–0.21 (89%)attempts 29–8goals 0–0

  2. Martin – Letang14:43

    xG 0.71–0.55 (56%)attempts 22–14goals 1–0

  3. Scuderi – Cole11:29

    xG 0.25–0.26 (49%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestWingels – Goodrow – Hertl3:52

    xG 0.30–0.22 (58%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Scott – Smith – Tierney3:40

    xG 0.08–0.16 (32%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

  3. Thornton – Pavelski – Karlsson11:20

    xG 0.51–0.61 (45%)attempts 15–16goals 0–1

  4. Wingels – Hertl – Tierney5:42

    xG 0.08–0.34 (20%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Hannan – Burns11:16

    xG 0.38–0.77 (33%)attempts 12–20goals 0–0

  2. Vlasic – Braun16:17

    xG 0.56–0.96 (37%)attempts 15–21goals 0–1

  3. Dillon – Mueller12:59

    xG 0.34–1.24 (21%)attempts 9–24goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 2.0 xGPIT 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 40/100 · #686 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.38 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 81% of the time.

SJS winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).