Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 15, 2015·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Detroit Red Wings 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DET2921313525
PIT09019115143

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:21DETRiley SheahanAssists: Marek Zidlicky, Brendan Smith · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 18:06DETTeemu PulkkinenGWGAssists: Niklas Kronwall, Marek Zidlicky · Slap, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P2 0:39DETMarek ZidlickyPPAssists: Henrik Zetterberg, Pavel Datsyuk · Slap, 0.13 xG3–0
  4. P2 7:44DETHenrik ZetterbergAssists: Gustav Nyquist · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–0
  5. P3 3:02DETTeemu PulkkinenAssists: Danny DeKeyser, Riley Sheahan · Slap, 0.10 xG5–0
  6. P3 9:10PITDavid PerronAssists: Sidney Crosby, Patric Hornqvist · Snap, 0.14 xG5–1
Penalties (19)
  1. P1 0:33DETKyle Quincey: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  2. P1 0:33PITDavid Perron: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P1 12:24PITSteve Downie: Misconduct10 min
  4. P1 19:18PITPaul Martin: Roughing2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:18DETJustin Abdelkader: Roughing2 min
  6. P1 19:18PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  7. P1 19:48PITBrandon Sutter: Tripping2 min
  8. P1 0:00PITChris Kunitz: Misconduct10 min
  9. P1 0:00PITChris Kunitz: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P2 9:13DETBrendan Smith: Tripping2 min
  11. P2 10:35PITKris Letang: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  12. P2 10:35PITKris Letang: Misconduct10 min
  13. P2 10:35PITKris Letang: Game misconduct10 min
  14. P2 14:05DETHenrik Zetterberg: Too many men on the ice2 min
  15. P2 16:44DETJonathan Ericsson: Interference2 min
  16. P2 16:44PITSteve Downie: Cross checking2 min
  17. P2 16:44DETJonathan Ericsson: Cross checking2 min
  18. P3 5:37PITSteve Downie: Misconduct10 min
  19. P3 11:48DETHenrik Zetterberg: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
46% to win54% to win
← DET attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Zetterberg
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETPIT
25Shots on goal43
2.2Expected goals3.9
45Shot attempts69
26Faceoffs won40
4Power plays4
14Penalty minutes64
22Hits40
17Blocked shots12
0Giveaways1
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. Zetterberg – Abdelkader – Nyquist11:28

    xG 0.29–0.30 (49%)attempts 7–14goals 1–0

  2. Sheahan – Pulkkinen – Jurco7:14

    xG 0.29–0.31 (49%)attempts 10–12goals 1–1

  3. Miller – Andersson – Glendening9:50

    xG 0.05–0.26 (15%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

  4. Cole – Datsyuk – Tatar10:57

    xG 0.21–0.75 (22%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Zidlicky – Smith11:52

    xG 0.12–0.12 (48%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  2. Quincey – DeKeyser13:18

    xG 0.38–0.40 (48%)attempts 11–19goals 2–0

  3. Kronwall – Ericsson12:57

    xG 0.21–0.86 (19%)attempts 6–16goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Comeau – Sutter7:48

    xG 0.61–0.20 (75%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Crosby – Hornqvist – Perron9:47

    xG 0.50–0.19 (72%)attempts 12–3goals 1–1

  3. Comeau – Winnik – Sutter2:13

    xG 0.16–0.03 (84%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  4. Downie – Spaling – Bennett5:07

    xG 0.10–0.01 (87%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Lovejoy9:23

    xG 0.58–0.28 (67%)attempts 7–8goals 0–1

  2. Ehrhoff – Cole2:17

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Lovejoy – Cole3:51

    xG 0.17–0.10 (62%)attempts 8–1goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.9 xGDET 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITDET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1037 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.57 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 77% of the time.

PIT winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).