Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Mar 16, 2015·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Montréal Canadiens 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 73% of the time.

TBL winsMTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MTL012112110234
TBL21411119434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:07TBLValtteri FilppulaPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:58TBLSteven StamkosUnassisted · Slap, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:45TBLVictor HedmanGWGAssists: Alex Killorn, Ryan Callahan · Wrist, 0.09 xG0–3
  4. P2 11:10MTLTomas PlekanecPPAssists: P.K. Subban, Andrei Markov · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–3
  5. P3 0:34MTLPA ParenteauAssists: Tomas Plekanec · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:55TBLSteven StamkosENAssists: Vladislav Namestnikov, Jason Garrison · Wrist, 0.60 xG2–4
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 2:21TBLBrenden Morrow: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 2:21TBLBrenden Morrow: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 9:29MTLGreg Pateryn: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 12:09TBLMike Angelidis: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 12:09MTLBrandon Prust: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 15:04MTLAlex Galchenyuk: High sticking2 min
  7. P1 15:04TBLVictor Hedman: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 6:39MTLBrandon Prust: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  9. P2 9:40MTLBrendan Gallagher: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 9:40TBLVladislav Namestnikov: Fighting5 min · PPG
  11. P2 10:31TBLJT Brown: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 13:51MTLJacob de la Rose: Hooking2 min
  13. P3 3:08TBLMike Angelidis: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 3:08MTLBrandon Prust: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 12:58TBLRyan Callahan: Hooking2 min
  16. P3 17:38MTLLars Eller: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MTL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← MTL attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johnson won the faceoff against Desharnais
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MTLTBL
34Shots on goal34
1.7Expected goals2.9
57Shot attempts56
35Faceoffs won39
4Power plays4
25Penalty minutes25
20Hits28
11Blocked shots12
8Giveaways8
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. Eller – Smith-Pelly – de la Rose7:39

    xG 0.22–0.24 (47%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Plekanec – Parenteau – Pacioretty5:19

    xG 0.02–0.07 (20%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Desharnais – Gallagher – Galchenyuk6:19

    xG 0.20–0.30 (41%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

  4. Plekanec – Parenteau – Galchenyuk4:01

    xG 0.06–0.17 (26%)attempts 5–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGilbert – Emelin2:10

    xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Emelin – Pateryn9:59

    xG 0.25–0.13 (66%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

  3. Gilbert – Petry11:25

    xG 0.40–0.49 (45%)attempts 11–10goals 1–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestFilppula – Boyle – Drouin9:39

    xG 0.52–0.19 (74%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  2. Johnson – Kucherov – Namestnikov8:44

    xG 0.39–0.22 (64%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  3. Callahan – Killorn – Stamkos11:14

    xG 0.28–0.25 (53%)attempts 7–9goals 1–0

  4. Johnson – Kucherov – Brown2:06

    xG 0.13–0.20 (40%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarle – Garrison14:24

    xG 0.75–0.50 (60%)attempts 15–18goals 0–0

  2. Barberio – Sustr11:56

    xG 0.44–0.26 (63%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  3. Stralman – Hedman15:16

    xG 0.33–0.45 (42%)attempts 10–14goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.9 xGMTL 1.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLMTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it MTL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 63/100 · #407 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.00 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
MTL 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 73% of the time.

TBL winsMTL wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − MTL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).