Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 21, 2015·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

St. Louis Blues 3, Minnesota Wild 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL06213110329
MIN21131116628

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:47MINChris StewartUnassisted · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:14MINThomas VanekAssists: Justin Fontaine, Ryan Suter · Deflected, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:39MINZach PariseAssists: Jonas Brodin, Mikael Granlund · Wrist, 0.37 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:05MINJonas BrodinGWGAssists: Justin Fontaine, Charlie Coyle · Slap, 0.02 xG0–4
  5. P2 10:02STLVladimir TarasenkoPPAssists: Jaden Schwartz, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–4
  6. P2 11:41STLJaden SchwartzAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Jay Bouwmeester · Backhand, 0.22 xG2–4
  7. P2 16:11MINJustin FontaineAssists: Charlie Coyle, Ryan Suter · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–5
  8. P3 10:48MINMikko KoivuPPAssists: Jason Pominville, Mathew Dumba · Deflected, 0.11 xG2–6
  9. P3 14:07STLPaul StastnyPPAssists: Alexander Steen, David Backes · Tip-in, 0.16 xG3–6
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 14:24MINRyan Suter: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 18:24STLT.J. Oshie: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 8:40MINThomas Vanek: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 12:48STLPaul Stastny: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 18:20MINZach Parise: Holding2 min
  6. P3 5:21STLPatrik Berglund: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 10:05STLVladimir Tarasenko: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 13:12MINChris Stewart: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Steen won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLMIN
29Shots on goal28
1.9Expected goals2.1
54Shot attempts49
31Faceoffs won22
4Power plays4
8Penalty minutes8
13Hits16
12Blocked shots14
4Giveaways5
9Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestLehtera – Tarasenko – Schwartz6:07

    xG 0.47–0.02 (96%)attempts 10–1goals 1–0

  2. Steen – Backes – Oshie9:25

    xG 0.24–0.12 (67%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  3. Stastny – Berglund – Jaskin6:28

    xG 0.29–0.19 (61%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

  4. Berglund – Lehtera – Jaskin4:16

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Pietrangelo3:56

    xG 0.31–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 1–0

  2. Jackman – Michalek4:16

    xG 0.32–0.14 (69%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  3. Jackman – Pietrangelo3:05

    xG 0.21–0.07 (75%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Parise – Granlund11:23

    xG 0.64–0.28 (70%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  2. Koivu – Stewart – Niederreiter9:49

    xG 0.34–0.21 (61%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

  3. Bergenheim – Brodziak – Haula9:46

    xG 0.14–0.09 (62%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  4. Vanek – Coyle – Fontaine8:44

    xG 0.29–0.61 (32%)attempts 7–9goals 3–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Brodin11:57

    xG 0.95–0.68 (58%)attempts 15–20goals 4–1

  2. Leopold – Dumba15:29

    xG 0.19–0.14 (57%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Spurgeon14:29

    xG 0.38–0.33 (53%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 2.1 xGSTL 1.9 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #343 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.74 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 53% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 55% of the time.

MIN winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).