Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 31, 2015·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Vancouver Canucks 5, Nashville Predators 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 79% of the time.

NSH winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN0721226002525
NSH21119116020438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:30NSHCody FransonPPAssists: Mike Fisher · Snap, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:15NSHTaylor BeckAssists: Paul Gaustad · Snap, 0.14 xG0–2
  3. P2 4:04VANLinden VeyAssists: Derek Dorsett, Dan Hamhuis · Snap, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:04VANJannik HansenAssists: Nick Bonino, Dan Hamhuis · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2
  5. P2 19:30NSHViktor StalbergAssists: Anton Volchenkov · Snap, 0.03 xG2–3
  6. P3 1:23VANAlexandre BurrowsSHUnassisted · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–3
  7. P3 5:48VANChris HigginsPPAssists: Alexandre Burrows, Nick Bonino · Tip-in, 0.14 xG4–3
  8. P3 14:57NSHMike FisherPPUnassisted · Wrist, 0.27 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. NSH Mike Santorelli stopped
  2. 2. VAN Nick Bonino scored
  3. 3. NSH Filip Forsberg stopped
  4. 4. VAN Radim Vrbata scored
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 2:36VANKevin Bieksa: Illegal check to head2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:24NSHViktor Stalberg: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 10:24VANDerek Dorsett: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 16:21NSHMike Fisher: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  5. P2 1:19VANHenrik Sedin: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 4:40VANHenrik Sedin: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  7. P2 5:27NSHCraig Smith: Holding2 min
  8. P2 19:30VANRonalds Kenins: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 2:24VANRadim Vrbata: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 4:04NSHCraig Smith: Interference2 min · PPG
  11. P3 14:19VANChris Higgins: Hooking2 min · PPG
  12. P3 16:06VANAlexandre Burrows: Interference5 min
  13. P3 16:06VANAlexandre Burrows: Game misconduct10 min
  14. P3 16:06VANKevin Bieksa: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gaustad won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANNSH
25Shots on goal38
1.2Expected goals2.7
45Shot attempts71
35Faceoffs won43
3Power plays7
39Penalty minutes8
22Hits15
16Blocked shots13
3Giveaways8
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. Vrbata – Higgins – Bonino7:08

    xG 0.21–0.20 (50%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  2. Hansen – Horvat – Kenins8:28

    xG 0.14–0.16 (48%)attempts 11–4goals 0–1

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Burrows7:41

    xG 0.29–0.32 (48%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  4. Dorsett – Matthias – Vey6:20

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBieksa – Sbisa13:31

    xG 0.46–0.30 (60%)attempts 18–9goals 0–0

  2. Hamhuis – Weber10:15

    xG 0.26–0.25 (50%)attempts 7–13goals 1–0

  3. Edler – Weber2:34

    xG 0.05–0.12 (29%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestGaustad – Beck – Bourque7:05

    xG 0.42–0.10 (81%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Santorelli – Stalberg – Jarnkrok7:07

    xG 0.20–0.08 (71%)attempts 6–4goals 0–1

  3. Ribeiro – Smith – Forsberg9:52

    xG 0.23–0.22 (51%)attempts 8–8goals 0–0

  4. Fisher – Wilson – Arvidsson7:17

    xG 0.08–0.10 (46%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestVolchenkov – Ellis9:58

    xG 0.28–0.08 (77%)attempts 7–5goals 1–1

  2. Josi – Jones13:50

    xG 0.40–0.21 (65%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

  3. Franson – Ekholm11:13

    xG 0.37–0.49 (43%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.7 xGVAN 1.2 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #30 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.85 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 79% of the time.

NSH winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).