Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Apr 3, 2015·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Chicago Blackhawks 4, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 65% of the time.

BUF winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI212012212436
BUF011116211338

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:16CHIDuncan KeithAssists: Brandon Saad, Andrew Shaw · Slap, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:36CHIPatrick SharpAssists: David Rundblad, Brad Richards · Snap, 0.06 xG2–0
  3. P2 13:10BUFMarcus FolignoAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen · Backhand, 0.27 xG2–1
  4. P3 5:29BUFJohan LarssonPPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Tyler Ennis · Tip-in, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P3 12:42BUFMarcus FolignoAssists: Brian Gionta, Rasmus Ristolainen · Wrist, 0.34 xG2–3
  6. P3 18:17CHIJonathan ToewsAssists: Andrew Shaw · Wrist, 0.50 xG3–3
  7. P3 19:04CHIJonathan ToewsGWGAssists: Brandon Saad, Marian Hossa · Wrist, 0.12 xG4–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 13:26CHIMarcus Kruger: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 19:59BUFJohan Larsson: Boarding2 min
  3. P2 6:51BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  4. P2 12:16BUFTyson Strachan: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 12:16CHIAndrew Desjardins: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 14:13CHIAndrew Shaw: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 17:30BUFNikita Zadorov: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 4:21CHIKimmo Timonen: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P3 11:14BUFZach Bogosian: Cross checking2 min
  10. P3 11:14CHIKris Versteeg: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← CHI attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Larsson won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIBUF
36Shots on goal38
2.4Expected goals3.2
61Shot attempts50
38Faceoffs won31
3Power plays3
13Penalty minutes13
7Hits20
10Blocked shots16
5Giveaways1
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Versteeg – Toews9:57

    xG 0.27–0.20 (57%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0

  2. Desjardins – Kruger – Teravainen8:21

    xG 0.11–0.22 (34%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  3. Richards – Vermette – Sharp9:12

    xG 0.36–0.57 (39%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

  4. Bickell – Shaw – Saad8:30

    xG 0.10–0.47 (17%)attempts 6–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Hjalmarsson14:50

    xG 0.34–0.20 (64%)attempts 15–6goals 0–0

  2. Timonen – Seabrook11:25

    xG 0.53–0.65 (45%)attempts 13–9goals 0–1

  3. Keith – Rundblad14:21

    xG 0.19–0.81 (19%)attempts 11–16goals 1–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestFoligno – Deslauriers – Grigorenko9:55

    xG 0.73–0.25 (74%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  2. Hodgson – Dalpe – Varone6:04

    xG 0.38–0.29 (57%)attempts 6–8goals 0–2

  3. Ellis – Kaleta – Schaller5:59

    xG 0.25–0.19 (56%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  4. Gionta – Ennis – Larsson15:44

    xG 0.14–0.39 (26%)attempts 8–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMeszaros – Ristolainen13:44

    xG 0.98–0.42 (70%)attempts 12–16goals 1–1

  2. Benoit – Zadorov8:19

    xG 0.48–0.50 (49%)attempts 7–11goals 0–2

  3. Strachan – Bogosian17:18

    xG 0.15–0.29 (33%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.2 xGCHI 2.4 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #69 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.44 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +47 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 65% of the time.

BUF winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).