Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 4, 2015·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, Columbus Blue Jackets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 75% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT115110111336
CBJ012210313535

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:21PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Ian Cole · Tip-in, 0.12 xG1–0
  2. P2 11:07PITBrandon SutterAssists: Ian Cole, Nick Spaling · Snap, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P2 16:25CBJNick FolignoAssists: Brandon Dubinsky, Artem Anisimov · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–1
  4. P2 18:28CBJMatt CalvertAssists: Marko Dano, Mark Letestu · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. P3 6:46CBJNick FolignoAssists: Brandon Dubinsky · Tip-in, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 9:29CBJScott HartnellGWGAssists: Marko Dano, Alexander Wennberg · Tip-in, 0.30 xG2–4
  7. P3 10:10PITBen LovejoyAssists: Blake Comeau, Daniel Winnik · Slap, 0.02 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:03CBJNick FolignoENAssists: David Savard, Brandon Dubinsky · Wrist, 0.62 xG3–5
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 1:43CBJKevin Connauton: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 8:41PITSteve Downie: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P1 12:52PITBeau Bennett: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P1 18:05CBJBrandon Dubinsky: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 3:16PITSteve Downie: Holding2 min
  6. P3 12:30CBJJack Johnson: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
46% to win54% to win
← PIT attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Dubinsky
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCBJ
36Shots on goal35
2.4Expected goals4.0
53Shot attempts58
31Faceoffs won36
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
24Hits36
11Blocked shots8
3Giveaways5
1Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Comeau – Winnik9:54

    xG 0.62–0.37 (62%)attempts 11–9goals 1–1

  2. Downie – Sutter – Spaling8:19

    xG 0.29–0.24 (54%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  3. Adams – Lapierre – Bennett4:53

    xG 0.16–0.14 (52%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  4. Crosby – Hornqvist – Perron11:16

    xG 0.26–0.56 (32%)attempts 4–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMartin – Lovejoy17:37

    xG 0.38–0.22 (64%)attempts 13–9goals 1–0

  2. Scuderi – Chorney12:11

    xG 0.53–0.39 (57%)attempts 9–12goals 0–0

  3. Cole – Pouliot10:45

    xG 0.81–0.85 (49%)attempts 12–14goals 2–2

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestDubinsky – Foligno – Anisimov9:40

    xG 0.79–0.17 (83%)attempts 11–4goals 2–1

  2. Hartnell – Dano – Wennberg7:10

    xG 0.88–0.33 (73%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

  3. Letestu – Calvert – Dano4:39

    xG 0.44–0.19 (70%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  4. Letestu – Calvert – Morin6:33

    xG 0.19–0.04 (83%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTyutin – Prout17:34

    xG 0.62–0.24 (72%)attempts 13–9goals 1–1

  2. Johnson – Savard15:56

    xG 0.87–0.64 (58%)attempts 18–14goals 1–2

  3. Goloubef – Connauton11:39

    xG 0.45–0.88 (34%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 4.0 xGPIT 2.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #190 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.82 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 13% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +30 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 75% of the time.

CBJ winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).