Sat, Apr 4, 2015·BB&T Center, Sunrise
Tampa Bay Lightning 4, Florida Panthers 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 61% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBL | 07 | 29 | 26 | 422 |
| FLA | 07 | 015 | 012 | 034 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 6:10TBLSteven StamkosPPGWGAssists: Tyler Johnson, Nikita Nesterov · Slap, 0.05 xG1–0
- P2 11:19TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Ryan Callahan · Snap, 0.04 xG2–0
- P3 1:03TBLRyan CallahanAssists: Steven Stamkos · Snap, 0.07 xG3–0
- P3 18:13TBLTyler JohnsonAssists: Jonathan Drouin · Snap, 0.11 xG4–0
Penalties (5)
- P1 7:20TBLMark Barberio: High sticking2 min
- P2 2:16TBLTyler Johnson: Hooking2 min
- P2 5:12FLATomas Kopecky: Tripping2 min · PPG
- P3 10:38TBLSlater Koekkoek: Interference2 min
- P3 12:14TBLLuke Witkowski: Tripping2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Boyle
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Tampa Bay Lightning
Forward lines
- bestJohnson – Palat – Kucherov9:26
xG 0.47–0.10 (82%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0
- Callahan – Stamkos – Drouin10:46
xG 0.45–0.43 (51%)attempts 13–16goals 2–0
- Filppula – Namestnikov – Paquette8:46
xG 0.27–0.30 (47%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0
- Morrow – Boyle – Brown10:46
xG 0.13–0.43 (23%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestCarle – Barberio3:20
xG 0.26–0.03 (91%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Stralman – Koekkoek2:38
xG 0.25–0.12 (67%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0
- Barberio – Witkowski11:18
xG 0.29–0.32 (47%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0
Florida Panthers
Forward lines
- bestJokinen – Hayes – Trocheck9:46
xG 0.38–0.02 (94%)attempts 10–2goals 0–0
- Boyes – Bolland – Pirri11:11
xG 0.34–0.13 (72%)attempts 11–5goals 0–0
- MacKenzie – Kopecky – Upshall11:05
xG 0.35–0.24 (59%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0
- Jagr – Huberdeau – Barkov13:32
xG 0.43–0.69 (39%)attempts 16–15goals 0–2
Defence pairs
- bestCampbell – Ekblad16:06
xG 0.69–0.14 (83%)attempts 22–6goals 0–1
- Mitchell – Gudbranson16:59
xG 0.60–0.65 (48%)attempts 18–18goals 0–1
- Kulikov – Petrovic16:01
xG 0.39–0.65 (37%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 61% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (FLA − TBL), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).